The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.1844 Tuesday, 24 July 2001
[1] From: Graham Hall <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 23 Jul 2001 18:22:03 +0000
Subj: Re: SHK 12.1828 Re: Wearing Swords at Home
[2] From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 23 Jul 2001 17:33:14 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 12.1828 Re: Wearing Swords at Home
[3] From: Steve Roth <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 23 Jul 2001 15:44:34 -0700
Subj: Re: SHK 12.1828 Re: Wearing Swords at Home
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Graham Hall <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 23 Jul 2001 18:22:03 +0000
Subject: 12.1828 Re: Wearing Swords at Home
Comment: Re: SHK 12.1828 Re: Wearing Swords at Home
Steve Urquartowitz writes:
>With wearing weapons at home or castle as with most things, there must
>have been a lot of variety of usages, a social semiotics of domestic
>armament.
>
>In the Alexander Iden/Jack Cade scene in 2 Henry VI, in the 1595 text
>Iden comes onstage, imagined as his hedged garden, accompanied by some
>of his men. He sees Cade, is challenged by him, and has to send one of
>his men out to "fetch weapons." The 1623 text instead has Iden enter
>alone, there is no command to anyone to bring in an offstage sword, so >in
this version he has to be entering earlier bearing arms.
Shakespeare does have a character comment on folk looking for a fight
who go into pubs with their rapiers of course. (Although I have not seen
much of this in the Vale of the White Horse, Oxfordshire, of late,
notwithstanding the many retirement enclaves in the neighbourhood.|)
The conflated Harry Sixes given at the Watermill, Newbury, last year had
Cade and the establishment arriving - "tooled up" as the vernacular has
it - with baseball bats (although the future Dicky III was refined
enough to employ a cut throat razor). There was also a lot of red
cabbage bashing and slashing, but nothing citrus. Oh, such times, etc.
Best wishes,
Graham Hall
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 23 Jul 2001 17:33:14 -0400
Subject: 12.1828 Re: Wearing Swords at Home
Comment: Re: SHK 12.1828 Re: Wearing Swords at Home
> I take it you mean Cinna was hanged upside down like Mussolini.
Il Duce was actually shot to death. The body was hung by the heels for
display purposes only. (Note: "Hung," not "hanged," as he was already
dead.)
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve Roth <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 23 Jul 2001 15:44:34 -0700
Subject: 12.1828 Re: Wearing Swords at Home
Comment: Re: SHK 12.1828 Re: Wearing Swords at Home
> The Romans wore a long and a short sword into battle.
Note also that Laertes is noted for his skill with "rapier and dagger."
(Ham. That's two of his weapons; but, well.)
Steve
http://princehamlet.com
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>
|