The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.1878 Friday, 27 July 2001
[1] From: Stevie Gamble <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 26 Jul 2001 11:24:58 EDT
Subj: Re: SHK 12.1868 Re: Down at the Heel
[2] From: Karen Peterson-Kranz <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 26 Jul 2001 08:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 12.1868 Re: Down at the Heel
[3] From: Don Bloom <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 26 Jul 2001 13:47:13 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 12.1868 Re: Down at the Heel
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Stevie Gamble <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 26 Jul 2001 11:24:58 EDT
Subject: 12.1868 Re: Down at the Heel
Comment: Re: SHK 12.1868 Re: Down at the Heel
> >Looking at the pictures of the old crook's body being displayed, I would
> >say "by the ankles" were \I a pedant.
>
> So would I; but the idiom is "by the heels." I have never figured out
> how that can actually be done.
I think that the process involved driving spikes through the heels
themselves; you might like to look at Homer for a heart-rending
variation on that theme. The question has particular resonance for me,
since I have been inadvertently spiking myself rather a lot on all these
costumes...
Best wishes,
Stevie Gamble
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Karen Peterson-Kranz <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 26 Jul 2001 08:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: 12.1868 Re: Down at the Heel
Comment: Re: SHK 12.1868 Re: Down at the Heel
> >Looking at the pictures of the old crook's body
> being displayed, I would
> >say "by the ankles" were \I a pedant.
>
> So would I; but the idiom is "by the heels." I have
> never figured out
> how that can actually be done.
I cannot remember who told me this, or in what source I may have found
it, but I have a distinct memory of learning at one time that "hanging
by the heels" was yet another wonderful innovation in torture: one used
something like a meathook, through/under the Achilles tendons, and thus
the task is accomplished.
As mentioned, I have no citation. I don't *think* I'm imagining this.
At least I hope I'm not.
Frightening the horses,
Karen
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Don Bloom <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 26 Jul 2001 13:47:13 -0500
Subject: 12.1868 Re: Down at the Heel
Comment: Re: SHK 12.1868 Re: Down at the Heel
Harry G. Rusche confesses,
>I am a pedant. We old-timers still use "hang/hanged/hanged." "Hung" we
>reserve for other uses and meanings.
True, but as Feste notes, "He that is well-hanged in this world need
fear no colors." And just to make sure we didn't miss the joke, he
suggests that it "prevents a bad marriage."
In both senses, I suppose.
Cheers,
don
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>