2001

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.1406  Thursday, 7 June 2001

[1]     From:   Sean Lawrence <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Wednesday, 06 Jun 2001 09:15:08 -0700
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.1379 Re: Why Shakespeare

[2]     From:   Sam Small <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Wednesday, 06 Jun 2001 19:11:30 +0100
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.1379 Re: Why Shakespeare

[3]     From:   Sean Lawrence <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Wednesday, 06 Jun 2001 12:03:06 -0700
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.1398 Re: Why Shakespeare


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Sean Lawrence <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Wednesday, 06 Jun 2001 09:15:08 -0700
Subject: 12.1379 Re: Why Shakespeare
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.1379 Re: Why Shakespeare

Gabriel writes,

>Miss SMALL's claim was that a writer would not dramatize the successful
>refutation of a view held by the writer. This betrays, I submit, a
>feeble literary sense (low 40s on the undergraduate percentage scale).
>Dostoyevsky did indeed dramatize such a refutation: Ivan succeeds in
>refuting Alyosha's justification of the existence of evil.

I'm wondering if the passage cited was actually a refutation of a claim
held by the author.  What was Dostoyevsky's personal justification of
the existence of evil?  I would tend to think that, as an
existentialist, Dostoyevsky would have been rather impatient with such
pat casuistries, while building his faith on different and more
experiential grounds.

Cheers,
Se 

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.