Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2001 :: June ::
Re: Branagh H5
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.1583  Thursday, 22 June 2001

From:           Andrew W. White <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Wednesday, 20 Jun 2001 14:13:55 -0400
Subject:        Interpreting Branagh

Having read Graham Bradshaw's vitriolic take on Branagh's Henry V, I
have to wonder how he feels about the Olivier version that preceded it?
To call Branagh's version 'shallow' begs the question:  in comparison to
what?  However naive Branagh may have been in his own interpretation, if
we take Olivier's version as the standard (and I would argue that it
certainly was _the_ standard before Branagh, especially for the WW-II
generation that first saw it) his Henry has depth by the butt-load.
Olivier's Hal is squeaky-clean, no blood is spilt, and the battlefield
is unrealistically sunny.

The only real quarrel I had was that, as long as Branagh was going to
create a more realistic atmosphere -- rain, gallows and all -- I don't
see why he insisted on creating a 'hill' at Agincourt, when the field
itself is as flat as a pancake.  Did he really need the "Comanches on
the hill" bit, with the French nobility standing in as Indians?

Andrew White
Arlington, VA

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.