The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.0355 Wednesday, 6 February 2002
From: Alex Went <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 6 Feb 2002 08:50:48 -0000
Subject: Sonnet 116
How do fellow SHAKSPERians interpret the grammatical structure of the
final line of Sonnet 116? KDJ is silent on the ambiguity, and I don't
think we can use the later non-authorial manuscript reproduced in Appx A
of Arden III as evidence of one reading over another. Kerrigan's
Penguin introduction suggests the 'universal' reading, while his
footnote admits the possibility of a particular subject. I don't have
Booth to hand but no doubt someone will e-ticipate me.
Alex Went
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|