2002

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.0355  Wednesday, 6 February 2002

From:           Alex Went <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Wednesday, 6 Feb 2002 08:50:48 -0000
Subject:        Sonnet 116

How do fellow SHAKSPERians interpret the grammatical structure of the
final line of Sonnet 116? KDJ is silent on the ambiguity, and I don't
think we can use the later non-authorial manuscript reproduced in Appx A
of Arden III as evidence of one reading over another.  Kerrigan's
Penguin introduction suggests the 'universal' reading, while his
footnote admits the possibility of a particular subject.  I don't have
Booth to hand but no doubt someone will e-ticipate me.

Alex Went

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.