The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.0378  Friday, 8 February 2002

[1]     From:   Sean Lawrence <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Thursday, 07 Feb 2002 09:50:19 -0800
        Subj:   Re: Dialogic Stage Directions/Authorial Intention

[2]     From:   Clifford Stetner <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Thursday, 7 Feb 2002 21:40:21 -0500
        Subj:   Re: Dialogic Stage Directions/Authorial Intention

[3]     From:   Kenneth Meaney <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Friday, 08 Feb 2002 10:03:48 +0200
        Subj:   Re: SHK 13.0361 Re: Dialogic Stage Directions


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Sean Lawrence <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Thursday, 07 Feb 2002 09:50:19 -0800
Subject: 13.0346 Dialogic Stage Directions/Authorial Intention
Comment:        Re: SHK 13.0346 Dialogic Stage Directions/Authorial Intention

In his defense of the term "dialogic stage directions", Stephen Dobbin
misses one possible advantage.  Anyone faced with an argument about what
would have to take place on stage can now dismiss the whole line of
reasoning by declaring "I have no idea what you mean by 'dialogic stage
directions'."  It would be so much easier than having to respond with
another argument.

Cheers,
Se