Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2002 :: January ::
Criticism, Authority and Simon Russell Beale
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.0101  Thursday, 17 January 2002

From:           Charles Weinstein <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Wednesday, 16 Jan 2002 19:03:50 -0500
Subject:        Criticism, Authority and Simon Russell Beale

1. A negative review is a satirical attack on bad art.  Those who think
that satire should never be savage had better re-read Catullus, Martial,
Juvenal, Dryden, Swift, Pope, Byron et al.  If those examples strike
them as too lofty or remote, they need only look at Forbidden Broadway
and Saturday Night Live.

2. As Mike Jensen has so eloquently written, "criticism is not a
democratic process."   The victory belongs to those with superior
knowledge, education, experience and insight.  We may justly look to
such spirits as examples and guides.  That is why I quoted John Simon
and Robert Brustein, the most learned, rigorous and insightful drama
critics in America.  They are also the most experienced--for example,
Brustein is Artistic Director at the A.R.T. where Thomas Derrah is
currently playing Iago.

3. It seems that Brian Willis and I both have "preconceived" or optimal
notions of what Hamlet should be like.  We both believe that he should
be "powerful, intelligent, funny, tragic and charismatic."
Unfortunately, Beale was none of those things.  Moreover, it is not the
case that Simon's, Brustein's or my review focussed exclusively on
Beale's face and physique, deplorable as those were.  On the contrary,
Simon wrote of Beale's wretched verse-speaking, squealing voice and
charmless personality.  Brustein discussed Beale's middle-class or
suburban aura, his tiresome and unvarying air of snide disdain, his lack
of sexual chemistry with Ophelia.  My own review cited many of the same
defects while focussing on Beale's gray monotony, his sluggish mind and
spirit, his failure to be moving or even interesting.  Mr. Willis is
free to deem these murky qualities "luminous." I believe that Simon,
Brustein and I have reached a more accurate assessment.  Thanks to Simon
and Brustein's imprimatur, it is an assessment which no honest theater
historian can ignore or misrepresent.

--Charles Weinstein

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
http://explorer.msn.com
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.