The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.0151 Wednesday, 23 January 2002
From: Paul E. Doniger <
Date: Tuesday, 22 Jan 2002 22:49:54 -0500
Subject: 13.0143 Hamlet (Once More)
Comment: Fw: SHK 13.0143 Hamlet (Once More)
Ed Taft writes,
> But the problem with these explanations is that if they are really meant
> as "proof" of the Ghost's goodness, then Hamlet should immediately
> effect revenge and the play should be over.
But revenge is a complex moral issue, both socially and religiously, in
Elizabethan England (and beyond), and incompatible with 'goodness' as
Hamlet is all too aware; of course, we have already discussed not long
ago the issue of The Ghost undermining his own call for vengeance.
Ed also writes,
> I see these points as "ways out" for members of the audience who cannot
> bear -- or choose not to consider -- that the provenance of the Ghost
> continues to be a puzzle -- and unsolvable one, in my view -- to the
> very end of the play.
I couldn't agree more!
Paul E. Doniger
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.