|
Re: Shakespearian/Shakespearean |
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.0913 Tuesday, 2 April 2002
[1] From: Alex Went <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 1 Apr 2002 18:26:53 +0100
Subj: RE: SHK 13.0903 Shakespearean/Shakespearian
[2] From: Brian Willis <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 1 Apr 2002 19:47:52 -0800 (PST)
Subj: Re: SHK 13.0903 Re: Shakespearian/Shakespearean
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Alex Went <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 1 Apr 2002 18:26:53 +0100
Subject: 13.0903 Shakespearean/Shakespearian
Comment: RE: SHK 13.0903 Shakespearean/Shakespearian
This puzzle you've placed on my desk
(Whether '-ian' or '-ean' or 'esque')
Has us all disagreein';
But 'Shakespeherian'
's entirely Eliotesque.
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Brian Willis <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 1 Apr 2002 19:47:52 -0800 (PST)
Subject: 13.0903 Re: Shakespearian/Shakespearean
Comment: Re: SHK 13.0903 Re: Shakespearian/Shakespearean
I think Hardy is probably right on this one. It also explains the
difference of Virgil and Vergil, and I have always seen Keatsean and
never Keatsian. It might purely boil down to a divergence in English and
"American" English.
Brian Willis
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|