|
Re: Questions on Much Ado About Nothing |
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1203 Wednesday, 1 May 2002
[1] From: Todd Pettigrew <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 30 Apr 2002 13:38:46 -0300
Subj: Re: SHK 13.1180 Questions on Much Ado About Nothing
[2] From: Jeffrey Myers <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 30 Apr 2002 13:53:58 -0400
Subj: RE: SHK 13.1197 Re: Questions on Much Ado About Nothing
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Todd Pettigrew <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 30 Apr 2002 13:38:46 -0300
Subject: 13.1180 Questions on Much Ado About Nothing
Comment: Re: SHK 13.1180 Questions on Much Ado About Nothing
>Question 2: Dogberry seems related to the constables in city comedies,
>usually set in London. He does have the only wholly English name in the
>play. Why an English name? Is he supposed to be connected to an English
>comic type?
Dogberry is much like the Mechanicals in Dream -- obviously English
characters transposed into another place and time, without justification
or explanation.
t.
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jeffrey Myers <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 30 Apr 2002 13:53:58 -0400
Subject: 13.1197 Re: Questions on Much Ado About Nothing
Comment: RE: SHK 13.1197 Re: Questions on Much Ado About Nothing
> From: Christopher Moore <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
> Dear Jack,
>
> Some thoughts on question one. The only sin Conrade is guilty of is
> hearing Borachio describe his success. It seems in harmony with the
> play that Conrade's crime is simply that he "hears" Borachio,
> given the
> amount of 'noting' that goes on, and overhearing that takes place.
Is he not also an accomplice through his silence?
> Conrade says "I am a Gentlemen" and Borachio clearly is not...he is
> "entertained for a perfumer". I think part of the scene
> between Conrade
> and Borachio before they are arrested touches on this difference of
> class.
Is this essentialist viewpoint endorsed somewhere in the play? Might
not a gentleman be "entertained as a perfumer"? Is it not possible in
this play for a gentleman to act unlike a gentleman, whether the
performance is so intended or not?
Jeff Myers
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|