|
Re: "Blackboard"- Enhanced Course |
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1891 Friday, 13 September 2002
From: Alberto Cacicedo <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 12 Sep 2002 11:13:36 -0400
Subject: 13.1887 Re: "Blackboard"- Enhanced Course
Comment: Re: SHK 13.1887 Re: "Blackboard"- Enhanced Course
I agree with David Lindley when he says that the
>endless emphasis on assessment, marks, results is one of the things that
>is stifling students of this generation (they can never believe that in
>three years as an undergraduate in the late 60s I did not receive a
>single 'grade' for any piece of work except the final examination). And
>therefore in using my university's home-grown equivalent to Blackboard I
>make a point of insisting that posts to the 'discussion rooms' are
>absolutely not assessed, but simply a means of initiating argument
>before a seminar and continuing it afterwards. But it's very hard to
>get this through to students fearful of posting in case 'their' ideas
>get 'stolen' by one of their peers for assessed work. Which is why I
>insist that at least one posting is compulsory in the first two or three
>weeks of a course - this works, and works quite well. It's persuading
>them that there is intellectual benefit (rather than additional marks)
>in continuing the discussion for themselves that is difficult, and I've
>found only a minority of students ready to continue discussions under
>their own steam.
Unfortunately, my experience so far makes it so that my Panglossian
moments are few.
Alberto Cacicedo
Albright College
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|