Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2002 :: September ::
Re: The Supernatural and Modernity
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1906  Tuesday, 17 September 2002

[1]     From:   R. A. Cantrell <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 16 Sep 2002 09:59:41 -0500
        Subj:   Re: SHK 13.1901 Re: The Supernatural and Modernity

[2]     From:   W.L. Godshalk <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 16 Sep 2002 14:29:53 -0400
        Subj:   Re: SHK 13.1901 Re: The Supernatural and Modernity


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           R. A. Cantrell <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Monday, 16 Sep 2002 09:59:41 -0500
Subject: 13.1901 Re: The Supernatural and Modernity
Comment:        Re: SHK 13.1901 Re: The Supernatural and Modernity

>For once we are in agreement
>on the fact that there are no universals. BUT that does not necessarily
>mean that everything is relative.
>
>Have I opened up another can of worms here?

Of institutional proportions. Can relativism be discussed without the
deployment of the relativist trope?

All the best,
R.A. Cantrell
<
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           W.L. Godshalk <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Monday, 16 Sep 2002 14:29:53 -0400
Subject: 13.1901 Re: The Supernatural and Modernity
Comment:        Re: SHK 13.1901 Re: The Supernatural and Modernity

>I had no idea that you were being ironical! For once we are in agreement
>on the fact that there are no universals. BUT that does not necessarily
>mean that everything is relative.

writes John Drakakis.

I wonder how a thing can exist in the cosmos and NOT be relative to
something else in the cosmos. But I haven't studied physics since high
school, and perhaps I've missed something in Scientific American.

Yours,
Bill Godshalk

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.