The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1634 Monday, 15 July 2002
From: Douglas Chapman <
Date: Friday, 12 Jul 2002 12:17:14 EDT
Subject: Hamlet in Sioux Falls
I saw Ivan's Hamlet last evening. The one featuring the 8-month pregnant
This is the best rendition of Hamlet I've seen.
A word of explanation. Not to pen a lengthy review (which the
performance deserves) but I have always been standoffish about Hamlet.
Reading joyous fits of ecstasy a la H. Bloom have never made me warm to
this over-long and, to me--very strange--play.
Ivan cut just the right parts to perform it outdoors in the "round" in
two hours without intermission. Bravo! It worked as a play like I never
seen it before.
That said, I found the fuss over an obviously pregnant Gertrude
inconsequential. She was in a smock most of the time, and dressed as a
gravedigger merely looked a bit short and squat. The "realism" of a
pregnant queen was for me made unimportant by the genderless casting.
Alerts: a young high school girl (very talented); Horatio a young
college girl. If one came to accept THESE castings then why worry over
the pregnancy of the queen in "real" terms? Now if Vicki had been a
pregnant Claudius? Would that have been more or less a question than a
female teen Laertes?
Ivan made the play work. It was marvelous to see Hamlet as much more
than a whiny do nothing. Two especially innovative calls (at least for
me): Ophelia and Hamlet in obvious cahoots when Cl. and Pol. are behind
the arras; Gertrude seeing the ghost, but then pretending not to.
The queen, played by a pregnant female, became irrelevant as I must say
(albeit a bit grudgingly) did a female Laertes. By duel-time, she (he)
really had me. Bravo director.
Tutti bravi cast.
This is one Hamlet all SHAKSPEReans should have the opportunity to see.
And the admission is free!
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.