The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1533 Thursday, 20 June 2002
[1] From: P. D. Holland <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 20 Jun 2002 08:53:14 +0100
Subj: Re: Abrams and Foster on "A Funeral Elegy"
[2] From: Nora Kreimer <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 20 Jun 2002 08:37:03 -0300
Subj: NY Times Article
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: P. D. Holland <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 20 Jun 2002 08:53:14 +0100
Subject: 13.1523 Re: Abrams and Foster on "A Funeral Elegy"
Comment: Re: SHK 13.1523 Re: Abrams and Foster on "A Funeral Elegy"
Now that even Abrams and Foster agree that 'A Funeral Elegy' is
extraordinarily unlikely to be by Shakespeare, will it be removed from
future editions of Complete Works that chose (rushed?) to include it
(e.g. the Norton [cautiously placed in an appendix] and Riverside 2)?
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Nora Kreimer <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 20 Jun 2002 08:37:03 -0300
Subject: NY Times Article
An article regarding the Abrams and Foster on "A Funeral Elegy" thread
appears in today