Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2002 :: June ::
Re: Abrams and Foster on "A Funeral Elegy"
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1533  Thursday, 20 June 2002

[1]     From:   P. D. Holland <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Thursday, 20 Jun 2002 08:53:14 +0100
        Subj:   Re: Abrams and Foster on "A Funeral Elegy"

[2]     From:   Nora Kreimer <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Thursday, 20 Jun 2002 08:37:03 -0300
        Subj:   NY Times Article


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           P. D. Holland <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Thursday, 20 Jun 2002 08:53:14 +0100
Subject: 13.1523 Re: Abrams and Foster on "A Funeral Elegy"
Comment:        Re: SHK 13.1523 Re: Abrams and Foster on "A Funeral Elegy"

Now that even Abrams and Foster agree that 'A Funeral Elegy' is
extraordinarily unlikely to be by Shakespeare, will it be removed from
future editions of Complete Works that chose (rushed?) to include it
(e.g. the Norton [cautiously placed in an appendix] and Riverside 2)?

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Nora Kreimer <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Thursday, 20 Jun 2002 08:37:03 -0300
Subject:        NY Times Article

An article regarding the Abrams and Foster on "A Funeral Elegy" thread
appears in today

 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.