The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.0409 Friday, 28 February 2003
[1] From: Mari Bonomi <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 27 Feb 2003 10:52:01 -0500
Subj: RE: SHK 14.0396 Re: Questions
[2] From: D. Bloom <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 27 Feb 2003 12:21:41 -0600
Subj: Re: SHK 14.0396 Re: Questions
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mari Bonomi <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 27 Feb 2003 10:52:01 -0500
Subject: 14.0396 Re: Questions
Comment: RE: SHK 14.0396 Re: Questions
I still maintain (while I agree that Juliet is a far stronger
personality than Romeo and frankly a more interesting one) that the
reason for the closing couplet is quite simple:
There are few rhymes for Juliet, fewer still that would make sense at
the conclusion of the story line. However "Woe" and "Romeo" is a most
convenient closing.
Mari Bonomi
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: D. Bloom <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 27 Feb 2003 12:21:41 -0600
Subject: 14.0396 Re: Questions
Comment: Re: SHK 14.0396 Re: Questions
L. Swilley on the last line of R&J:
>>>Romeo & Juliet: The final line of the play reverses the name order
>>>of the title to Juliet & her Romeo. Might it be because she has finally
>>>won power over a patriarchal society?
>
>Since Juliet is the main character in this tragedy, the one who is most
>seen 1) insisting on taking her position in the adult society, then 2)
>trying to conceal it, it seems most appropriate that she should be the
>focus of the last line of the play, a line that identifies her as the
>principal subject of the play, Romeo her "charge".
Not to be a kill-joy or anything, but Romeo rhymes with "woe." (And
"gentle" ekes out the pentameter line.)
I spent a happy few minutes thinking of rhymes for "-et." I couldn't
find anything that either substituted adequately for "woe," or provided
the ribaldry necessary for a satisfactory parody. Any suggestions?
Cheers,
don
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|