Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2003 :: March ::
Re: Questions
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.0515  Monday, 17 March 2003

From:           Takashi Kozuka <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Saturday, 15 Mar 2003 22:56:11 0000
Subject:        Re: Questions

Just in case I didn't make my point clear enough in my previous post
(and probably I didn't). I'm not an expert in early modern rhetoric, so
I assumed that by "early modern rhetoric" David meant rhetoric that
Shakespeare may have been familiar with - for example, rhetoric he may
have learned at the local grammar school. Shakespeare appears to have
read some books on rhetoric (for example, The Garden of Eloquence), but
was he familiar with the rhetoric within the branch of heraldic law that
James is talking about? How do we know, or can we know, Shakespeare
knew/followed it? Or does it matter? Was his audience familiar with
heraldic law? Did Shakespeare read any of those books James mentioned?
Any evidence?

Best wishes,
Takashi

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.