The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.0524 Tuesday, 18 March 2003
Date: Monday, 17 Mar 2003 12:05:57 -0500
Subject: 14.0513 Re: Echo of Shakespeare
Comment: Re: SHK 14.0513 Re: Echo of Shakespeare
>Theobald, on the
>other hand, is a lot harder to deal with, since what we have is the
>re-write of a play with no known copies, and once we consider that the
>lines quoted could have been originally by Fletcher.
True. However, III, i, is not usually attributed to Fletcher, and the
passage seems Shakespearean enough to my poor judgment.
At any rate, Pope's opinions on "Double Falshood" have to be excluded,
not only because he was prejudiced, but because we know his public
statements on the subject to have been insincere.
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.