|
Re: Shakespeare and the Psalms |
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.0908 Monday, 12 May 2003
[1] From: Bill Arnold <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 9 May 2003 12:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 14.0894 Shakespeare and the Psalms
[2] From: John Ramsay <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 10 May 2003 02:40:18 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 14.0894 Shakespeare and the Psalms
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bill Arnold <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 9 May 2003 12:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: 14.0894 Shakespeare and the Psalms
Comment: Re: SHK 14.0894 Shakespeare and the Psalms
Tue Sorensen writes, "Am I right in assuming that there are real stories
and serious theories that this was in fact the case; that Shakespeare's
hand is in the King James Bible? And if so, does anyone know who has
written about this, and how the main arguments run? Of course I realize
that there is nowhere near definitive proof."
My book of last year, 2002, JESUS: The Gospel According To Will,
explores and expounds upon this at length. Email me offlist for a copy
if you wish.
Bill Arnold
http://www.cwru.edu/affil/edis/scholars/arnold.htm
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Ramsay <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 10 May 2003 02:40:18 -0400
Subject: 14.0894 Shakespeare and the Psalms
Comment: Re: SHK 14.0894 Shakespeare and the Psalms
>In the excellent comic book, Sandman #75, Shakespeare mentions to a
>local clergyman that "they gave me some psalms to beautify". Am I right
>in assuming that there are real stories and serious theories that this
>was in fact the case; that Shakespeare's hand is in the King James
>Bible? And if so, does anyone know who has written about this, and how
>the main arguments run? Of course I realize that there is nowhere near
>definitive proof.
>
>Tue Sorensen
Antony Burgess: The Clockwork Testament 1974
Sela -:)
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|