The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.2368 Monday, 15 December 2003
[1] From: Steve Roth <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 13 Dec 2003 16:46:44 -0800
Subj: Re: SHK 14.22878 Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist
[2] From: Steve Roth <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 13 Dec 2003 16:59:52 -0800
Subj: Re: SHK 14.2299 Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve Roth <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 13 Dec 2003 16:46:44 -0800
Subject: 14.22878 Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist
Comment: Re: SHK 14.22878 Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist
Seb Perry:
>I was wondering whether any members of the list have read Lukas Erne's
>very recent publication, _Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist_... Does anyone
>have any thoughts on this?
My review will be published soon, so I'll just say that he packs a
well-loaded argument. Comprehensively researched, and a pleasure to
read. Seems a great deal of effort to go to, to demonstrate that S.'s
plays are literature, but you know how it is....
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve Roth <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 13 Dec 2003 16:59:52 -0800
Subject: 14.2299 Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist
Comment: Re: SHK 14.2299 Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist
Tony Burton <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
> writes,
>In this view, Q2 might have been a "copyright text" all along,
An answer somewhat askant to your question, but still an answer, I
believe: Erne makes the strong point supported by Blayney et al. that an
entry in the stationer's register didn't just protect a given text. It
protected the stationer's member from *any* similar work which might
interfere with sales. Erne uses this to argue that every pre-1603
Shakespeare play that was not so enjoined (or otherwise impeded) was, in
fact, published.
Steve
http:princehamlet.com
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
