The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.1854 Thursday, 25 September 2003
[1] From: L. Swilley <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 24 Sep 2003 07:05:46 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 14.1845 Ambiguous Words
[2] From: L. Swilley <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 24 Sep 2003 07:15:52 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 14.1845 Ambiguous Words
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: L. Swilley <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 24 Sep 2003 07:05:46 -0500
Subject: 14.1845 Ambiguous Words
Comment: Re: SHK 14.1845 Ambiguous Words
Peter Groves writes:
>I agree with Carol that the play is profoundly anti-Semitic...
If it is, it is also profoundly anti-Christian.
L. Swilley
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: L. Swilley <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 24 Sep 2003 07:15:52 -0500
Subject: 14.1845 Ambiguous Words
Comment: Re: SHK 14.1845 Ambiguous Words
Bob Rosen writes,
>I've never heard of any Western legal code that grants executionary
>power to a party, etc.
In the case of "Merchant," it does. That's a fact of the *play*; we can
no more question that fact than we can doubt that Portia is accepted as
a man, Balthasar, that she is undectected by Bassanio, or that she
could be so knowledgeable of the law.
L. Swilley
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|