Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2003 :: July ::
Re: King John, Titus, Peele
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.1344  Wednesday, 2 July 2003

[1]     From:   Bob Grumman <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Tuesday, 1 Jul 2003 08:21:46 -0400
        Subj:   Re: SHK 14.1332 Re: King John, Titus, Peele

[2]     From:   Graham Hall <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Tuesday, 01 Jul 2003 13:51:05 +0000
        Subj:   But soft, who comes here?


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Bob Grumman <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Tuesday, 1 Jul 2003 08:21:46 -0400
Subject: 14.1332 Re: King John, Titus, Peele
Comment:        Re: SHK 14.1332 Re: King John, Titus, Peele

>A week ago on this thread, Ward Elliott courteously introduced himself
>and invited Jim Carroll to do the same. After he received no response
>except further contention from Mr. Carroll on the "Lover's Complaint"
>thread, Professor Elliott replied last Wednesday, repeating his polite
>request. In a post on Friday, Mr. Carroll declined, while on this
>thread, Brian Vickers defended his books against attacks by Mr. Carroll
>on HLAS, where he said Mr. Carroll was using the aliases KQKnave and
>Agent Jim.
>
>Yesterday on this thread, Bob Grumman defended Mr. Carroll, said that he
>considered KQKnave a friend, and said that it "does appear" that Mr.
>Carroll is KQKnave.
>
>So it seems we have a pseudonym (KQKnave) of what could perhaps be a
>pseudonym (Jim Carroll).  How many pseudonyms are being deployed on
>HLAS?
>
>It's time for HLAS participants to set the record straight. It would be
>a service to the discourse for all concerned to say who is who.
>Otherwise, one might suppose that Jim Carroll is Donald Foster, KQKnave
>is David Kathman, and Bob Grumman is Terry Ross.
>
>Allbest,
>William S. Niederkorn

And just how could we "set the record straight" to a (see HLAS for my
opinion of Mr. Nieder-korn) who cannot get the record right about who a
man named William Shakespeare "really" was?

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Graham Hall <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Tuesday, 01 Jul 2003 13:51:05 +0000
Subject:        But soft, who comes here?

>[...]It would be a service to the discourse for all concerned to say who is who.
>Otherwise, one might suppose that Jim Carroll is Donald Foster,
>KQKnave is David Kathman, and Bob Grumman is Terry Ross.
>
>Allbest,
>William S. Niederkorn[...]

Well, if it helps clear things up............ I am the Walrus....(Koo,
Koo, Ka-Choo).

(Which is a way of suggesting, Hardy, that the time has come.....)

Graham Hall

[Editor's Note: And I thought that I was the Walrus (Goo, Goo, Ka-Choo).
Now I'm really confused. Hardy]

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
 

Other Messages In This Thread

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.