The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0255 Friday, 30 January 2004
[1] From: Ted Nellen <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 29 Jan 2004 08:10:31 -0600 (CST)
Subj: Re: SHK 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
[2] From: Max Gutmann <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 29 Jan 2004 06:22:42 -0800
Subj: RE: SHK 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
[3] From: Jack Heller <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 29 Jan 2004 09:25:27 -0500 (EST)
Subj: Re: SHK 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
[4] From: Dan Smith <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 29 Jan 2004 14:50:03 -0000
Subj: RE: SHK 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Ted Nellen <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 29 Jan 2004 08:10:31 -0600 (CST)
Subject: 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
Comment: Re: SHK 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
In NYC public schools we teach _Othello_, but not without controversy.
The one play I have never heard taught in a NYC public HS is _Merchant
of Venice_. I was told outright by an English chair many years ago, I
could not teach it as she found the play anti-Semitic. I wonder what
would happen if one wanted to teach _Titus_, but then some might ask why
would you want to? Well because it is such a cool play and so reflective
of NYC society sometimes.
tednellen
http://www.tnellen.com/
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Max Gutmann <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 29 Jan 2004 06:22:42 -0800
Subject: 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
Comment: RE: SHK 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
This is probably not of interest for the high school contest, but it's a
related topic (and now that the opportunity presents itself, I realize
how eager I am to spread the word).
My own book, There Was a Young Girl from Verona: A Limerick Cycle Based
on the Complete Dramatic Works of Shakespeare, after selling like
hotcakes at the Tudor Guild Gift Shop at Ashland's Oregon Shakespeare
Festival for a couple of months during the festival's off-season, was
removed from the shelves due to complaints from shoppers and volunteers.
(Following the tendency of limericks--and of Shakespeare--a couple of
the limericks in the books are bawdy, and one uses profane language.)
(http://www.ddaze.com is the URL if anyone's interested.)
Max Gutmann
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jack Heller <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 29 Jan 2004 09:25:27 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
Comment: Re: SHK 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
Whether Shakespeare's play or his own adaptation, I'm not sure, but
Bertolt Brecht's Coriolanus ran against political opposition.
Jack Heller
Huntington College
[4]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dan Smith <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 29 Jan 2004 14:50:03 -0000
Subject: 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
Comment: RE: SHK 15.0238 Banned Shakespeare
I'm not sure about banned but wasn't Measure for Measure the only play
to completely defy bowdlerisation (since all that remained afterwards
was a man making holiday plans)
Dan Smith
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|