January
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0247 Thursday, 29 January 2004 [1] From: Tom Cartelli <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 10:09:39 -0500 Subj: Re: SHK 15.0217 Who's the scholar? [2] From: Edward Brown <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 09:40:46 -0600 Subj: RE: SHK 15.0217 Who's the scholar? [3] From: Kevin De Ornellas <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 16:48:57 +0000 Subj: RE: SHK 15.0217 Who's the scholar? [1]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tom Cartelli <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 10:09:39 -0500 Subject: 15.0217 Who's the scholar? Comment: Re: SHK 15.0217 Who's the scholar? Emrys Jones [2]------------------------------------------------------------- From: Edward Brown <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 09:40:46 -0600 Subject: 15.0217 Who's the scholar? Comment: RE: SHK 15.0217 Who's the scholar? Barbara Everett? [3]------------------------------------------------------------- From: Kevin De Ornellas <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 16:48:57 +0000 Subject: 15.0217 Who's the scholar? Comment: RE: SHK 15.0217 Who's the scholar? >I am wondering who the scholar is in Al Pacino's Looking for Richard who >appears right after Pacino asserts that a scholar can explain why >Richard courts Anne. It is Emrys Jones. Kevin De Ornellas Queen's University, Belfast _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook,This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0246 Thursday, 29 January 2004 [1] From: Jack Heller <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 07:11:46 -0500 (EST) Subj: Re: SHK 15.0218 Henry V Question [2] From: Nora Kreimer <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 12:53:03 -0300 Subj: Re: SHK 15.0218 Henry V Question [1]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jack Heller <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 07:11:46 -0500 (EST) Subject: 15.0218 Henry V Question Comment: Re: SHK 15.0218 Henry V Question >Do you know of any instances >of accents being used in other plays at the time? Thomas Dekker gives characters Dutch accents in both Shoemaker's Holiday and The Roaring Girl. This would be in keeping with Dekker's own Dutch heritage. I think Middleton uses accents as well, though titles are not coming to me just now. Jack Heller Huntington College [2]------------------------------------------------------------- From: Nora Kreimer <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 12:53:03 -0300 Subject: 15.0218 Henry V Question Comment: Re: SHK 15.0218 Henry V Question To my mind, the ridicule to which both characters are exposed is lighter on Catherine, comic, laughable, funny. Then, when I think of Joan, Shakespeare's sarcasm and mockery is aimed at offence-giving and harder. I only have to turn myself into an Elizabethan Puritan to feel two very different reactions regarding these two characters, and these feeling leave no margin for doubt!!!! The sweetness of the accent Shakespeare gives to Katherine, Henry V's Queen, has to do with the love and admiration the character of Henry arouses. On the other hand, the levity and coarseness given to Joan has to do with the upbuild of a sense of patriotism that his time demanded from him then, under Elizabeth I. Accents in this case, I dare venture a hypothesis, has to do with purpose and attitude. Nora Kreimer Profesora Titular de Literatura Inglesa Instituto Superior del Profesorado Joaquin V. Gonzalez Buenos Aires Argentina _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook,This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0245 Thursday, 29 January 2004 From: Thomas Larque <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 12:05:15 -0000 Subject: 15.0223 Cordelia: Loss of Insolence (Studies in the Comment: Re: SHK 15.0223 Cordelia: Loss of Insolence (Studies in the Humanities) >>Does anybody have access to Sophia B. Blades's essay "Cordelia: Loss of >>Insolence" ... > >Shouldn't that have been entitled "Cordelia: Loss *by* Insolence," for >there's plenty of evidence in the character and in the play for *that*. L. Swilley might be making a point rather than asking a question, but in case anybody is interested, the "World Shakespeare Bibliography" pr
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0244 Thursday, 29 January 2004 From: R. A. Cantrell <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 10:13:53 -0600 Subject: 15.0215 Questions Related to Love's Labor's Lost Comment: Re: SHK 15.0215 Questions Related to Love's Labor's Lost >In my reading of LLL, I noticed in the opening scene clusters of >religious, military, and academic imagery. As the play progresses, we >are introduced to Don Armado the braggart soldier, Holofernes the >pedant, and Nathaniel the curate. Can anyone recommend any published >research that examines these characters as extensions on the imagery? You can't get better than Baldwin on LLL, especially on Holofernes. _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook,This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0243 Thursday, 29 January 2004 From: Stanley Wells <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > Date: Wednesday, 28 Jan 2004 12:11:57 -0000 Subject: 15.0224 Earl of Pembroke's Men Comment: RE: SHK 15.0224 Earl of Pembroke's Men Andrew Gurr's The Shakespearian Playing Companies (Oxford, 1996) is clearly more up to date than E. K. Chambers's The Elizabethan Stage of 1923. Stanley Wells _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook,This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.