The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0916  Wednesday, 21 April 2004

From:           Mac Jackson <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Wednesday, 21 Apr 2004 12:36:40 +1200
Subject: 15.0902 Double Falshood
Comment:        RE: SHK 15.0902 Double Falshood

James Doyle asks whether "the weight of scholarly opinion" agrees that
Double Falsehood is based on the lost Cardenio. Well, the Oxford Textual
Companion (1987) took this view, giving sound reasons for doing so.
Subsequent to the Kokowski article, there was A. Luis Pajuante, "Double
Falsehood and the Verbal Parallels with Shelton's Don Quixote",
Shakespeare Survey 51 (1998), 95-105. The topic is also treated by Peter
Seary in Lewis Theobald and the Editing of Shakespeare (Oxford, 1990)
and Jonathan Hope in The Authorship of Shakespeare's Plays (Cambridge,
1994).

Mac Jackson

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.