The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0969 Wednesday, 28 April 2004
[1] From: Edmund Taft <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Apr 2004 10:22:21 -0400
Subj: The Murder of Gonzago
[2] From: David Cohen <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Apr 2004 09:37:06 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 15.0956 The Murder of Gonzago
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Edmund Taft <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Apr 2004 10:22:21 -0400
Subject: The Murder of Gonzago
Tony Burton writes:
"In the case of "Hamlet," the ghost is presumably "real," i.e., it can
be seen by others than Hamlet himself, but the exact meaning if its
instructions and the safety and rightness of following them, both remain
doubtful."
Exactly right.
Ed Taft
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Cohen <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Apr 2004 09:37:06 -0500
Subject: 15.0956 The Murder of Gonzago
Comment: Re: SHK 15.0956 The Murder of Gonzago
In response to Sean Lawrence, you wrote, ". . . I think ascertaining
God's Will is the central intellectual problem in the play - both for
the audience and for Hamlet. And that's what I think the play from 4.4
on is primarily about." What specific part of the text do you have in
mind as evidence for this intriguing statement?
David Cohen
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|