The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.1724 Tuesday, 14 September 2004
[1] From: Stephen C. Rose <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 13 Sep 2004 06:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 15.1712 The Meaning of Hamlet
[2] From: R. A. Cantrell <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 13 Sep 2004 16:35:40 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 15.1712 The Meaning of Hamlet
[3] From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 13 Sep 2004 18:20:54 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 15.1712 The Meaning of Hamlet
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Stephen C. Rose <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 13 Sep 2004 06:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: 15.1712 The Meaning of Hamlet
Comment: Re: SHK 15.1712 The Meaning of Hamlet
Kenneth Chan writes:
QUOTE
Shakespeare was a highly advanced spiritual being who has left us with a
priceless legacy of plays aimed at imparting spiritual truths for the
betterment of humanity; it would therefore be a tragedy if we continue
to ignore this.
END QUOTE
I think this both exaggerates and undercuts an appreciation of
Shakespeare, among whose themes indeed are some which should resonate
today -- and have not merely a spiritual but a cultural and social and
historical impact.
We're a spectrum and WS even from the sparse fragments of biography we
have was not your basic Krishnamurti figure, keeping company with
various acolytes.
I of him as a revolutionary iconoclast who undercuts our entire notion
of honor and courage and so forth. We would have profited from a
Falstaff lesson in the wake of 9/11.
I think this has huge implications for our general advancement as a race.
But all this takes place in the morass of reality, not removed from it
and approaching it from some spiritual enclave or peak.
Best, S
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: R. A. Cantrell <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 13 Sep 2004 16:35:40 -0500
Subject: 15.1712 The Meaning of Hamlet
Comment: Re: SHK 15.1712 The Meaning of Hamlet
>Thank you, R. A. Cantrell, for your observation. It is valid, but only
>up to a point. Please may I explain.
>
>The question really boils down to this: How do we tell whether or not
>Shakespeare actually crafted Hamlet for a particular message? Perhaps
>there is simply no hard evidence for this.
Mr. Chan,
I believe that you are sincere in your exhortations, and that you wish
earnestly to engage in substantive argument regarding Hamlet. I urge
you to investigate, at least cursorily, Formal Skepticism. "Hard
evidence" is fraught with difficulties that you seem not to countenance.
I am on your side, trust that. Old timers on this list know that I
regularly scold artful skeptics when they attempt to confound (rather
than confute) the enterprisingly earnest.
-- All the best, R.A. Cantrell
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 13 Sep 2004 18:20:54 -0400
Subject: 15.1712 The Meaning of Hamlet
Comment: Re: SHK 15.1712 The Meaning of Hamlet
>Shakespeare was a highly advanced spiritual being who has left us with a
>priceless legacy of plays aimed at imparting spiritual truths for the
>betterment of humanity
He was a man, take him for all in all
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|