2005

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.0225  Thursday, 3 February 2005

[1]     From:   Michael Egan <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Wednesday, 2 Feb 2005 09:31:27 -1000
        Subj:   Re: SHK 16.0208 Date of King John

[2]     From:   Ward Elliott <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Wednesday, 02 Feb 2005 14:37:26 -0800
        Subj:   RE: SHK 16.0208 Date of King John


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Michael Egan <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Wednesday, 2 Feb 2005 09:31:27 -1000
Subject: 16.0208 Date of King John
Comment:        Re: SHK 16.0208 Date of King John

Bill Godshalk  wonders how the text of King John in F1 could suggest
performance dates.

Braunmuller (ed.): King John (OUP 1998) notes that F1 'shows
comparatively little evidence of theatre use.' This is supported by that
fact that the first two acts, as they are now usually designated, are
confusingly headed Actus Primus, Sc 

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.