The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.0443 Wednesday, 9 March 2005
From: Michael Egan <
Date: Tuesday, 8 Mar 2005 06:54:52 -1000
Subject: 16.0430 Date of King John
Comment: Re: SHK 16.0430 Date of King John
Peter Bridgman writes of King John: '... The play would not have
survived (or been performed) if WS had gone any further in this direction.'
It's what I've been saying all along.
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.