2005

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.0932  Wednesday, 18 May 2005

[1]     From:   Arthur Lindley <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Tuesday, 17 May 2005 22:14:09 +0800
        Subj:   RE: SHK 16.0920 Antony and Cleopatra 4.3

[2]     From:   Sandra Sparks <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Wednesday, 18 May 2005 03:45:05 -0400
        Subj:   RE: SHK 16.0920 Antony and Cleopatra 4.3

[3]     From:   Marga Munkelt <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Tuesday, 17 May 2005 17:55:06 +0200
        Subj:   Re: SHK 16.0920 Antony and Cleopatra 4.3


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Arthur Lindley <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Tuesday, 17 May 2005 22:14:09 +0800
Subject: 16.0920 Antony and Cleopatra 4.3
Comment:        RE: SHK 16.0920 Antony and Cleopatra 4.3

 >I have often wondered in A&C V II why the Clown keeps punning on the
 >word "worm"? Cleopatra first uses the word "worm" in line 243 and then
 >after many uses in line 279  "CLOWN. Yes, forsooth; I wish you joy o'
 >th' worm".  Why does Shakespeare not use the word "asp"?

Because worms, not asps, are associated with what will happen to her
dead body and ours.

Arthur

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Sandra Sparks <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Wednesday, 18 May 2005 03:45:05 -0400
Subject: 16.0920 Antony and Cleopatra 4.3
Comment:        RE: SHK 16.0920 Antony and Cleopatra 4.3

My take on Elliot Stone's question, why WS didn't use the word asp:

Elizabethan audiences would have immediately picked up on the
correlation of worm with death.

And, it makes for a much better, and more understandable, line, doesn't it?

Sandra Sparks

[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Marga Munkelt <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Tuesday, 17 May 2005 17:55:06 +0200
Subject: 16.0920 Antony and Cleopatra 4.3
Comment:        Re: SHK 16.0920 Antony and Cleopatra 4.3

As to the choice of "worm", you may find the commentary note in Marvin
Spevack's New Variorum Edition (MLA, 1990) helpful (TLN 3495, p. 332).

Best,
Marga Munkelt

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.