Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2005 :: December ::
Hamlet According to Hawkes
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.2032  Friday, 9 December 2005

From: 		David Bishop <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date: 		Friday, 9 Dec 2005 03:21:03 -0500
Subject: 	Hamlet According to Hawkes

I would like to propose a thread focused on a discussion of a prominent 
piece of Hamlet criticism, Telmah by Terence Hawkes (in his book That 
Shakespeherian Rag). Perhaps Professor Hawkes 'himself' will join in, if 
the discussion should become interesting.

Though of course anyone is free to participate, if I were making my own 
ideal rules I would want this discussion to be carried on by careful 
readers who are capable of paying attention to Hawkes and to Hamlet. 
Such statements are next to useless, but the point is that it may be 
time to be a little less nice to the murderous Gertruders. Or maybe just 
ignore them and move on. They don't deserve any more attention than they 
pay--though you do have to allow a little room for the naive enthusiast. 
I was once one myself.

To begin, then, on the first page of Telmah, already I find something 
that seems to me untrue. Professor Hawkes says of the opening of Hamlet, 
"it is immediately noticeable that the military are not in complete 
control. Fundamental errors occur....The password, 'Long live the king', 
could hardly be less appropriate: we know that a king has recently not 
lived long, and that another incumbent will soon cease to live."

What's wrong with this picture? To me it seems that "Long live the king" 
is a perfectly appropriate password, even when, maybe especially when, a 
king is recently deceased. Also, at this stage of the play we know 
nothing of the death of either king. If it's to be argued that we do 
indeed know because we have seen the play before, that changes the 
critical convention without notice. Does Hawkes mean to change that 
convention, or has he simply made a mistake?

Perhaps the rest of the essay will tell the tale. Next week: on to page 2!

Best wishes,
David Bishop

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the 
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the 
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
 

Other Messages In This Thread

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.