The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1952 Sunday, 27 November 2005
Date: Saturday, 26 Nov 2005 12:41:21 +0000
Subject: 16.1944 JC and Good Night, and Good Luck
Comment: RE: SHK 16.1944 JC and Good Night, and Good Luck
Richard Burt writes
>Wow. What bizarre responses to my post. For the record, I simply
described the film.
Perhaps now is a good moment for Richard Burt to explain the purpose of
his posts. What is the point of 'simply' describing a film if he has no
comment to make upon it? Most of Mr Burt's posts seem to consist of
describing any tangential reference to Shakespeare that he finds in
popular culture, but to what end? He never explains to the rest of us
why he wants to draw our attention to these references. So if he's not
giving us his opinion in order to provoke discussion, what's the point?
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.