The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1695 Tuesday, 4 October 2005
From: Joseph Egert <
Date: Monday, 03 Oct 2005 02:28:16 +0000
Subject: 16.1665 Caliban's Father
Comment: Re: SHK 16.1665 Caliban's Father
Alan Horn, yet another budding censor, chastises this humble amateur for
wondering out loud about possible anagrams Myriad Man may have wrought
for his TEMPEST figures--are they "All coincidence?"--likening me,
horror of horrors, to David Basch, our tireless leader in that department.
Hardy, allow me one last swing at Alan Horn's hardball before snipping
The question mark after "coincidence" is only partly rhetorical. I was
hoping to draw light from august scholars in our lively community on
just how to evaluate such possible wordplay. Are we to ignore "J.C." as
initials for both "Julius Caesar" and "Jesus Christ"? Are we to
discourage novel imaginative exegesis?
While I reject Basch's overall thesis of Shakespeare as a
crypto-converso, I'd limit censorship only to obsessive repetition of
specific points by the same poster, and not otherwise. One woman's
flower is another man's weed. Skepticism, yes. Censorship, no. Why not
heed our fellow SHAKSPERite (SHK 16.0620): "Perhaps we should do without
all-purpose rules about what we can and cannot know..."
Snip away, Hardy!
[Editor's Note: This thread is at an end. Further correspondence should
be done privately.]
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.