The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1748 Friday, 14 October 2005
Date: Thursday, 13 Oct 2005 12:47:33 -0400
Subject: 16.1740 A Shrew
Comment: Re: SHK 16.1740 A Shrew
Stephen Miller's conjecture that by 1623
>The Shrew may have acquired its sequel. If the players produced
>the two plays together, it would be logical for them to omit the
>Sly conclusion to The Shrew with its apparent closure of the
>thread to be taken up afresh by The Tamer Tam'd.
is intriguing. But if that were the case, wouldn't it be more logical
to omit the Sly frame entirely? Presumably, the intention would have
been to make the interior action stand on its own, so any implication of
a play within a play would be inapt.
Do we know if Shakespeare's company ever performed The Tamer?
In any case, I assume that Mr. Miller's best guess is that Shakespeare
wrote a continuation and completion of the Sly story and for some reason
it fell out of the text (probably a prompt book) used to compose F1. I
wonder if he has any idea of how close to the Shakespearean original A
Shrew comes to reproducing the lost scenes, especially the hilarious
epilogue which makes the entire play one extended joke.
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.