The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1783 Friday, 21 October 2005
[1] From: Jack Heller <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 20 Oct 2005 13:52:12 -0500 (EST)
Subj: Re: SHK 16.1775 Shakespeare and Science
[2] From: Larry Weiss <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 20 Oct 2005 17:36:02 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 16.1775 Shakespeare and Science
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jack Heller <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 20 Oct 2005 13:52:12 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 16.1775 Shakespeare and Science
Comment: Re: SHK 16.1775 Shakespeare and Science
I'm not sure that "science" applies as a subject of consideration in
Shakespeare's plays. However, as pseudosciences, including alchemy,
witchcraft, and Prospero's magic have already been mentioned, I would
add Owen Glendower's prognostications (from Henry IV, part 1) to this list.
Jack Heller
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Weiss <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 20 Oct 2005 17:36:02 -0400
Subject: 16.1775 Shakespeare and Science
Comment: Re: SHK 16.1775 Shakespeare and Science
Ceremon claimed that he used science, not magic, to revive Thaisa.
Helena made a similar claim for her cure of the king's fistula.
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.