The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1597  Saturday, 24 September 2005

[1] 	From: 	Richard Kennedy <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
	Date: 	Thursday, 22 Sep 2005 11:52:04 -0700
	Subj: 	Re: SHK 16.1580 lovelocks

[2] 	From: 	Jack Heller <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
	Date: 	Thursday, 22 Sep 2005 14:46:28 -0500 (EST)
	Subj: 	Re: SHK 16.1565 lovelocks


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: 		Richard Kennedy <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date: 		Thursday, 22 Sep 2005 11:52:04 -0700
Subject: 16.1580 lovelocks
Comment: 	Re: SHK 16.1580 lovelocks

The portrait of Southampton in the tower shows the man with his 
love-lock hair. http://ladysarafina.home.att.net/wriothesley.JPG I have 
also read that the bows on his glove cuffs were called lovelocks.

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: 		Jack Heller <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date: 		Thursday, 22 Sep 2005 14:46:28 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 16.1565 lovelocks
Comment: 	Re: SHK 16.1565 lovelocks

Following Jim Fitzmaurice's suggestion, I found a way to see a picture 
of a lovelock. Go to The Huntington Art Collections Catalogue at 
http://emuseum.huntington.org/code/emuseum.asp Enter "lovelock" into the 
search function, and click to enlarge the portrait that appears. I also 
appreciate the reference to Prynne sent to the list.

Cheers,
Jack Heller

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the 
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the 
editor assumes no responsibility for them.