The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1620 Monday, 26 September 2005
[1] From: Richard Kennedy <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sunday, 25 Sep 2005 07:00:40 -0700
Subj: Re: SHK 16.1597 lovelocks
[2] From: JD Markel <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sunday, 25 Sep 2005 14:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 16.1597 lovelocks
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Richard Kennedy <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sunday, 25 Sep 2005 07:00:40 -0700
Subject: 16.1597 lovelocks
Comment: Re: SHK 16.1597 lovelocks
Once again here's that lovelocks picture of Southampton in the Tower,
set up in comfort so it seems, with a scowling cat to keep him company,
his arm in a sling, a Good Book to read, and a manicurist in the wings.
Shakespeare's patron. It's said that he was a beautiful young man.
http://ladysarafina.home.att.net/wriothesley.JPG I think he looks
rather pinched and pursed about the mouth, a long face, thinly bearded,
not unattractive but in no way a beauty. Here's another of the man in
better times, with warrior gear laid about:
http://ladysarafina.home.att.net/wriothesley.JPG He looks to be tall,
and once again, in white this time and tied at his waist are two of
those "loveknots," I believe that is what they were called, and his hair
once again is in the lovelock style. Not a particularly "good leg," I
would judge. Most everyone concedes that this is the "tender churl" of
the first seventeen, the "sweet self" that Shakespeare addressed, his
beloved patron who got his long lovely fingers into the Essex business
and nearly got his hair cut off at the neck. Effeminate? Some say so.
Did Shakespeare and Southampton have a "thing"? Some say so. Here he is
again, years later, armored against such slander and shorn of his
lovelocks.
http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/images/Wriothesley,Henry(3ESouthampton)03.jpg
He aged well. But in his churlish youth was the "beauteous niggard" (S -
4) bi-sexual, closeted maybe with Shakespeare now and again? Some say
the Sonnets give proof of that, declaring Southampton to be the "fair
friend" who with his "lovely gaze" and "sweet form" inspired the great
poet to speak warmly of him, even hotly, even to the messy brink of a
sexual relationship. "Messy" to be understood as an adjective describing
the scholarship of such suggestions, nothing prejudice as to the sharing
of fluids between consenting adults.
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: JD Markel <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sunday, 25 Sep 2005 14:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: 16.1597 lovelocks
Comment: Re: SHK 16.1597 lovelocks
Joseph T. writes:
"(Prynne) calls them "Crisped-Lockes, " vnnaturall Loue-lockes" and
"Hairie excrements."
Use of "crisped" and maybe "vnnaturall" refers to hair that is curled
artificially, with the curling irons of the day. Given the male
portraits, we might today use "wavy" for "curly" for them.
Bassanio in MOV tells us "The world is still deceived with ornament"
giving as an example:
So are those crisped snaky golden locks
Which make such wanton gambols with the wind,
Upon supposed fairness, often known
To be the dowry of a second head,
The skull that bred them in the sepulchre.
S makes a morbid observation that the best wigs of the day were scalped
from dead young women. The wig's base was not a net but the deceased's
skin.
It was fashionable for women to tightly curl their hair or wigs
following the precedent of Elizabeth's wigs. The specs of the devices
they used I do not know but if anyone knows a text discussing
Elizabethan hair styles in depth I would appreciate a tip.
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|