The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1407 Friday, 26 August 2005
Date: Thursday, 25 Aug 2005 11:56:45 -0700
Subject: 16.1393 Wager
Comment: Re: SHK 16.1393 Wager
Although I have read and even transcribed Woodstock (from Rossiter's
edition, not the MS), I am an unqualified skeptic and will stay out of
this discussion. However, as an observer I find it annoying to see
continual references to "1 Richard II" as it presumes entirely too much
at this stage of the wager. It is as offputting as, say, blithe
references to "Oxford's Hamlet" or "Bacon's Macbeth" would be.
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.