Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2005 :: June ::
The Genius of Shakespeare
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1063  Wednesday, 8 June 2005

[Editor's Note: David Basch felt it important that he have the
opportunity to make some concluding remarks. All response should be
addressed directly to him at 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  ]

From:           David Basch <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Monday, 06 Jun 2005 21:59:54 -0400
Subject:        Re finishing off last discussion

1. Equal letter skip devices were known at the time of Shakespeare. An
example of it is to be found in the dedication of the Sonnets in which
is presented the full name of Henry Wriothesley. HENRY appears at a skip
of 16 letters and the surname appears in three parts, WR IOTH ESLEY, all
at a skip of 18 letters, though in one part the skip runs backwards.
This was discovered by the late John Rollett, a professor of physics.
[See P.S. below]

2. Steganographic elements in texts-messages that are invisible because
they are unsuspected or disguised-are not ciphers. As the Friedmans
noted in their book on the Shakespearean ciphers, ciphers are a
specialized kind of encryptions in which there is a "one to one"
relation between the letters of a message to be encrypted and that which
encrypts it. (The encryption of each letter can be through a single
letter or a group of letters, as in the case of binary systems in which
a certain combination of 0's and 1's represent each letter to be
encrypted.) The standards of ciphers are very precise lest accidental
letter strings become confused with valid ciphers.

But this is not usually the problem with steganographic systems since
the very complexity of the latter often argues that they are not random
occurrences and they are usually designed to be accompanied by other
corroborating signs that they are deliberately crafted devices. While
some instances may be debatable, the standard for validating them is not
such things as precise spelling of names and grammar-it is assumed that
these may at times only be approximated in such systems-but depends on a
complex of corroborating factors that are unlikely to appear under
accidental conditions and can be demonstrated to be such.

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.