The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.0044 Thursday, 16 February 2006
[1] From: Tom Bishop <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 10:34:34 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
[2] From: William Proctor Williams <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 10:51:42 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
[3] From: Kirk McElhearn <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 16:54:49 +0100
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
[4] From: Jack Kamen <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 12:01:08 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
[5] From: David Evett <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 12:13:55 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
[6] From: Paul E. Doniger <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 17:50:08 -0800 (PST)
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Tom Bishop <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 10:34:34 -0500
Subject: 17.0035 Vastation
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
OED has a good entry on it, including the interesting detail that it was
very common 1610-1660.
Bloom is right to use it, not for mere quirk or outlandishness (though
I'm not averse to such things), but for the overtones of "the creation
of a vast wasteland" going with the "wild" in "bewilderment". The image
of the experience of familial love in Lear as a great and wild
wasteland I find resonant, very apt to the play, and chiming also with
Antony and Cleopatra's very different but equally enlarged picture of
the "vast" (but not "vastated"!) possibilities of love.
Probably Bloom would assume Swedenborgian readers, given his rooting in
Blake, but here I think something else is at work.
Tom
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: William Proctor Williams <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 10:51:42 -0500
Subject: 17.0035 Vastation
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
The Online OED at this institution of higher learning (University of
Akron) provides these three definitions and although the first two are
obsolete the third is current, I think, and OED's last recorded use is 1892.
1. The action of laying waste, devastating, or destroying. Also freq.,
an instance of this. Obs. (very common 1610-60).
2. The fact or condition of being devastated or laid waste. Obs.
3.The action of purifying by the destruction of evil qualities or
elements. Also transf.
William Proctor Williams
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kirk McElhearn <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 16:54:49 +0100
Subject: 17.0035 Vastation
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
Anyone who's read a biography of Henry James will be familiar with that
term. Henry James Sr. had a "vastation", which changed his life... I've
seen it several times in reading about the James family.
I think the word means more an epiphany, at least according to what I've
seen of it. But an epiphany of desolation, not of inspiration.
Kirk
[4]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jack Kamen <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 12:01:08 -0500
Subject: 17.0035 Vastation
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
I find this definition in the OED 2002:
vastate, v.
trans. To render unsusceptible
1892 Harper's Mag.....That long passion of his early youth, which
seemed to have vastated him before he came there. He was rather proud of
his vastation.
Admittedly, it would require some lexical contortions to make it fit
Bloom's sentence.
Jack Kamen
[5]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Evett <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 12:13:55 -0500
Subject: 17.0035 Vastation
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
Bloom may just be remembering his Latin: vasto, vastare: to make empty,
lay waste, desolate [I select from a dozen possibilities]: the primary
sense, maybe worth trying to recuperate by reviving a moribund word
seems to invoke the desert (think of "Ozymandias")-- love so powerful
that it obliterates all that is familiar and comfortable. Not my idea
of what's going on between A & C, or indeed in at least some of the
familial relationships in *LKr*, but that probably explains why my
books don't sell by the tens of thousands.
David Evett
[6]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Paul E. Doniger <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 17:50:08 -0800 (PST)
Subject: 17.0035 Vastation
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0035 Vastation
My Concise Oxford Dictionary (Computer edition) gives:
vastation /va"steIS(@)n/
|