The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.0063 Monday, 20 February 2006
From: Jim Blackie <
Date: Wednesday, 15 Feb 2006 11:40:16 -0500
Subject: 17.0036 Re-reading Hamlet
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0036 Re-reading Hamlet
If so, I think we need new reading glasses. Or better teachers.
What is going on? Are we now re-inventing these plays as we go along?
Are we doomed to re-interpret the original text to align with our newest
obsessions with hidden agendas and conspiracy theories? Have we suddenly
all become very clever in our new-found 21st-century, penetrating
understanding? Or are we perhaps guilty of the same hubris and
self-delusion that gave us the discovery of pyramids on Mars?
I'm sorry for the rant, but can't we just let the plays speak for
themselves? Surely if WS wanted the audience to know something, it would
have been made sufficiently clear to everyone then, as now.
No offense meant to Geoff Ridden who merely poses the question. In
answer to that final question, I can only say "I sure hope not."
>Two recent re-workings of Hamlet emphasise and re-configure the role of
>Polonius. Charlotte Jones's 2001 play Humble Boy and in Stephen
>Churchett's recent TV drama, screened in the UK last month, Lewis (think
>Inspector Morse) both use the plot of Hamlet, but replace Claudius as
>Gertrude's lover with the figure of Polonius. Is this a sign of the way
>in the twenty-first century might view the play?
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.