The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.0083 Wednesday, 1 March 2006
[1] From: David Levine <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Sunday, 26 Feb 2006 17:42:30 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet
[2] From: Thomas Pendleton <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 27 Feb 2006 14:17:57 -0500
Subj: RE: SHK 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Levine <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Sunday, 26 Feb 2006 17:42:30 -0500
Subject: 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet
I don't know how everyone feels about this, but I am intending to
boycott this Arden 3 edition of Hamlet whatever the price, since it
strikes me as reflecting an utterly objectionable editorial policy.
Harold Jenkins Arden 2 edition remains one of the best books I have ever
owned; arguably the best example of a modern edition of a Shakespeare
play. This new edition seems to reflect a general tendency on the part
of editors to refuse to take any sort of real position on textual
matters. Jenkins himself deplored the edition and said he was glad he
would be dead when it came out.
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Thomas Pendleton <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 27 Feb 2006 14:17:57 -0500
Subject: 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet
Comment: RE: SHK 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet
I very much share John Briggs' reaction to the forthcoming Arden 3
Hamlet. It seems to me almost perverse to operate from a position that
effectively judges that there are three different plays called Hamlet
and that the "real Hamlet" is Q2. I acknowledge, of course, that there
is an argument to be made about the autonomy of each of the versions,
but as Mr. Briggs makes clear, the effects of that editorial position
can be-and it looks like will be-detrimental to making the play properly
available to those who value it.
The worst result is likely to be that this new Arden edition will
eventually replace Harold Jenkins' magisterial Arden 2 edition, which is
probably the closest we will ever get to an authoritative edition of
Hamlet. I can't believe that a publisher who proposes to sell the
second volume of Arden 3 for 55 pounds will recognize that Jenkins'
Hamlet ought to be kept available simply for its excellence.
Tom Pendleton
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.