Chandos Portrait Probably Genuine
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.0376 Monday, 1 May 2006
From: Elliott Stone <
Date: Saturday, 29 Apr 2006 21:27:06 -0400
Subject: 17.0372 Chandos Portrait Probably Genuine
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0372 Chandos Portrait Probably Genuine
I would like to thank Mr. Kathman for his kind remarks that my ideas are
rubbish and that the Martin Droeshout engraver was not the young man
born in 1601.
I hope that he will go on to set the Encyclopedia Britannica, The
Shakespeare Birthplace Trust and the Yale Center for British Art on the
correct path. They all have recently posted statements that agree with
me. I also still maintain, as I did earlier on this site, that an
understanding of the Editorship of the First Folio will give scholars
many new insights on the life and time of William Shakespeare.
Elliott H. Stone
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.