Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2006 :: May ::
Regarding "Waste of Shame"
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.0413  Monday, 8 May 2006

From: 		Sandra Sparks <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date: 		Sunday, 7 May 2006 06:51:20 -0400
Subject: 	Regarding "Waste of Shame"

I viewed "Waste of Shame," an idea of how WS wrote the sonnets, last 
night on BBC America. I come at this television show from a different 
point of view than most of you, scholars that you are. I am not 
surprised that English friends did not mention it to me, if it was 
released on British television at an earlier date.  Most of it I 
personally did not like, for reasons that would not interest most of the 
posters on this list. However, I have a question for you: what is it 
about Emilia Lanier that makes so many researchers want to sidestep the 
high probability that she was the "Dark Lady" of the sonnets? I commend 
the writers of the teleplay for making William Herbert, Earl of Pembroke 
the Lord of the sonnets (though the casting was poor, in my opinion), 
but having the Dark Lady turn out to be a whore was silly. And a waste 
of a beautiful actress (Indira Varma) to boot. I would have liked to 
have seen her take on Emilia.

The only casting I truly liked in the show was Zoe Wanamaker as Mary 
Sidney Herbert. Wonderful.

I have a second question for you: have you ever wondered how the 
original seventeen sonnets came back to WS? As a poet serving a patron, 
the poems written for a patron would have been the property of that 
person, not the writer himself. How were they returned to him, and why 
would he wait to publish in 1609? This leads to a third question: if WS 
had the patronage of Southampton, the Pembrokes, or possibly any other 
nobleman, he wasn't paid good money to sit around. What has happened to 
the other work he was paid for? He couldn't publish what was not legally 
his. What might have happened to the work? Does anyone have any ideas?

Sandra Sparks

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the 
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the 
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.