The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.0527 Friday, 2 June 2006
[1] From: Carol Barton <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 1 Jun 2006 10:21:55 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0521 Shakespeare's "Small Latin and Less Greek"
[2] From: Peter Bridgman <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 1 Jun 2006 22:56:22 +0100
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0521 Shakespeare's "Small Latin and Less Greek"
[3] From: R. A. Cantrell <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 01 Jun 2006 17:01:57 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0521 Shakespeare's "Small Latin and Less Greek"
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Carol Barton <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 1 Jun 2006 10:21:55 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Subject: 17.0521 Shakespeare's "Small Latin and Less Greek"
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0521 Shakespeare's "Small Latin and Less Greek"
I beg to differ, Abigail. Through the seventeenth century at least,
Latin was the language of scholarship, French the language of
diplomacy--and many a proud Protestant (John Milton, among them) writing
during the Reformation had "no small Latin" for that reason--though he
more than most abhorred the church of his grandfather (Roman
Catholicism). The likelihood that Shakespeare would have written private
correspondence in Latin is little, however, since (as you correctly
point out) there would have been few people in Shakespeare's sphere of
influence who could have read it--assuming he could write it.
Best to all,
Carol Barton
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Peter Bridgman <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 1 Jun 2006 22:56:22 +0100
Subject: 17.0521 Shakespeare's "Small Latin and Less Greek"
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0521 Shakespeare's "Small Latin and Less Greek"
Abigail Quart writes ...
>But say he had the effrontery to correspond in Latin. Would he
>be completely unafraid to appear as one who preferred the
>language of Catholicism? Because Latin was the language of
>the Catholic Church. Nobody else had any use for it at all.
I'll ignore Abigail Quart's knee-jerk anti-Catholicism. It's rather
boring and we've heard it before. I would point out however that Latin
remained the lingua franca, the learned language for scientific and
political affairs, for another two centuries after Shakespeare. All the
great British scientists from these centuries (Harvey, Newton, Boyle
etc) wrote and published in Latin. Today 80% of all scholarly and
academic English words are derived from Latin and Latin remains the
language for the classification of all living things.
Peter Bridgman
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: R. A. Cantrell <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 01 Jun 2006 17:01:57 -0500
Subject: 17.0521 Shakespeare's "Small Latin and Less Greek"
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0521 Shakespeare's "Small Latin and Less Greek"
>But say he had the effrontery to correspond in Latin. Would he be
>completely unafraid to appear as one who preferred the language of
>Catholicism? Because Latin was the language of the Catholic Church.
>Nobody else had any use for it at all.
It is not that you are misinformed, it is the degree to which you are
misinformed. Effrontery . . . zounds.
All the best,
R.A. Cantrell
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.