The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0041 Wednesday, 17 January 2007
[1] From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 17 Jan 2007 15:11:15 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
[2] From: Stuart Manger <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 17 Jan 2007 20:18:27 +0000 (GMT)
Subj: Re: SHK 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
[3] From: John Drakakis <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 18 Jan 2007 15:36:39 -0000
Subj: RE: SHK 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
[4] From: Hardy M. Cook <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2007
Subj: Re: SHK 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 17 Jan 2007 15:11:15 -0500
Subject: 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
Comment: Re: SHK 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
How can a mute "Hamlet" be said to be Shakespeare's play rather than,
say, Kyd's (?) "Hamlet" or Saxo's or Belleforest's or "Die Beschrafte
Brudermord"?
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Stuart Manger <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 17 Jan 2007 20:18:27 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
Comment: Re: SHK 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
Maybe it shows shocking taste on my part, but frankly, when I read this
posting, I thought it was an elaborate joke.
Wordless Shakespeare? Wordless maybe, but without the words Shakespeare
it ain't.
Stuart Manger
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Drakakis <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 18 Jan 2007 15:36:39 -0000
Subject: 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
Comment: RE: SHK 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
It's like 'What's My Line' Terry - a TV panel show that you and I will
remember. The actors do a bit of mime and the audience guesses what
they're up to! In the interval they sell tins of London Fog (to be
opened only in the dark!).
Cheers,
John Drakakis
[4]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Hardy M. Cook <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2007
Subject: 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
Comment: Re: SHK 18.0037 Wordless Macbeth
I Washington, D.C., suburban newspaper, The Falls Church News-Press, has
a piece on the Wordless Macbeth.
http://www.fcnp.com:80/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=745&Itemid=36
A 'Macbeth' With All the Moves, None of the Words
By Nicholas F. Benton
Thursday, 18 January 2007
Shakespeare without the words. There are two opportunities to experience
this during the opening stages of the Shakespeare in Washington festival
this month. One is the production of Prokofiev's "Romeo and Juliet" by
the Kirov Ballet at the Kennedy Center this weekend. The other is the
longer-running production of "Macbeth" by the Synetic Theatre Company at
the Spectrum in Rosslyn.
Maybe it's because I make my living as a word-smith. Maybe it's because
the development of language has been key to the evolution of the species
out of the muck. Maybe it's because the invention of moveable type has
been the precondition for the liberation of mankind from tyranny. Maybe
it's because Shakespeare, in particular, has not only demonstrated but
has conveyed to millions the enormous power of words through his plays
and poetry.
Maybe that's why the idea of Shakespeare without his words can be
puzzling. It seems kind of like turning off the loudspeakers during
Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech, or asking Michael Jordan
to play without a ball.
But perhaps it's a great tribute to Shakespeare, to the fact that his
works are so well known by almost everyone, that word-less, alternative
artistic forms of presenting his plays can further enhance and deepen
the public appreciation of him.
This is how I take, in particular, the highly creative and entertaining
Synetic Theatre production.
To make up for the lack of a single word spoken in the non-stop 1 hour,
40 minute show, there is an amazing amount of energy and expression.
There is perhaps no one single term to describe what they do, but it is
centered around motion. Part ballet, part modern dance, part mime, part
animated facial expressions, symbolic gestures, drama, humor and, of
course, overall visual storytelling. As they call it, "The Art of
Silence." The cast works with a single, dark set, utilizing three trap
doors with a tiny crawl space beneath that the audience, of course, does
not see. There's no intermission, and lots of smoke and loud, haunting
piped-in mood music.
To sum it up, I loved it. It's pretty clear when Lady Macbeth is
pronouncing, "Out, out damn spot!," and little doubt what's going on at
any point (I do recommend brushing up on the story before showing up.
There is a synopsis in the program).
But you don't have to concentrate on the story line if you don't want
to. I found it better to just sit back and let it pull me in. It's a
total sensual experience, a sheer delight, even if at times its surreal,
slow-motion segments reminded me of one of those flashbacks from my
misspent youth.
It starts off in smashing fashion with the witches' scene. That one has
always permitted directors great opportunity for creativity, and this is
no exception. Even for spoken productions of "Macbeth," this opening
with the witches would be grand.
[ . . . ]
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|