The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0258 Friday, 30 March 2007
[1] From: Bruce Young <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 10:52:33 -0600
Subj: RE: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
[2] From: Laura Pyle <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 12:53:17 -0400 (EDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
[3] From: Larry Weiss <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 14:16:03 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
[4] From: L. Swilley <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 15:00:40 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
[5] From: Richard Regan <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 20:44:24 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
[6] From: Mari Bonomi <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Wednesday, 28 Mar 2007 00:38:32 -0400
Subj: RE: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
[7] From: Colin Cox <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 22:52:51 -0700
Subj: Re: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bruce Young <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 10:52:33 -0600
Subject: 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Comment: RE: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
It seems there was a time when Romeo and Juliet were idealized and
viewed with undiluted sympathy. Someone ought to do the work to figure
out if there ever was such a time and when exactly it was.
But recently I've noticed that many YOUNG people, like the teenager
cited from MySpace, are put off by the story. I first distinctly
noticed that phenomenon when my own daughter-as a teenager about 10
years ago-described R&J as stupid and immature.
Yet another ten years earlier (the late 80s) I called for a balanced
response. My call was made in an article I'll cite later. But first I
want to make clear I realize we're NOT talking about a "real" pair of
teenagers. It's just a play. Still, I believe that writing and going
to plays has something to do with (on the audience's part) being open to
responding to the characters and events on the stage in something like
the way we would respond to real people and events and (on the writer's
part) using the various tools of dramatic composition and production to
call forth certain responses from the audience. In that encounter
between play and audience, of course, lots of unpredictable and
contradictory things end up happening that are not entirely in anybody's
control.
Here are a couple of bits of what I wrote about 20 years ago:
"These images of haste and wildness and of their disastrous results
influence our sense of time in the play-our sense that events are moving
too fast-and also help shape our impression of Romeo and Juliet as
characters who, though sympathetic and affecting, are also dangerously
young and impulsive, without control and judgment that might come with
more time and experience. Knowing that they are marrying at an age much
earlier than the norm clarifies and reinforces that impression. On the
other hand, the misconception that they are marrying at a usual age
actually contradicts the bent of the play and, if stubbornly clung to,
can blunt the effect of the play's events, images, and emotions.
Historical scholarship can benefit the reader and playgoer by helping
remove that misconception.
...
"In dealing with this and related issues, I believe that Shakespeare is
calling forth from audiences a complex response, one suited by its inner
contrasts and tensions for drama and one adequate (as simple responses
will not be) to the complexities of life, whether in the Renaissance or
in any period. The play's references to haste and wildness make it hard
to imagine that Shakespeare is simply celebrating a young couple's
violation of social norms. On the other hand, he portrays the pathos of
their situation and the beauty of their love so effectively as to make
it impossible to think of him as simply condemning them. What adds
further to the complexity of response the play elicits is that the
issues of age and consent end up counting for Romeo and Juliet as well
as against them."
If you're interested in my full argument (based in part on the fact that
the average age of marriage in Shakespeare's time was 25 or 26 for women
and 27 or 28 for men), you'll find it in "Haste, Consent, and Age at
Marriage: Some Implications of Social History for Romeo and Juliet,"
Iowa State Journal of Research 62 (1987-1988): 459-74.
Bruce Young
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Laura Pyle <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 12:53:17 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Comment: Re: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
This is from a paper I gave a couple of years ago, which addressed
Gough's question in part. The citations (and the rest of the paper) are
at http://lrrrp.blogspot.com/2005/11/gender-sex-romeo-and-juliet.html.
Romeo and Juliet holds a central place in the Western literary canon,
and popular literary critic Harold Bloom calls it "the largest and most
persuasive celebration of romantic love in Western literature" (90). Is
it such a celebration, however? To read the text as written in the
sixteenth century rather than as received in the twenty-first is to find
the most dick jokes of any Shakespeare play, a fatal conflation of
swords and penises, and the repeated equation of sex and death. Romeo
and Juliet suggests, rather than a celebration of romance, a critique of
hormonal love, and specifically of testosterone. Romeo's name has come
to mean, according to a survey respondent at James Madison University,
"the type of girl all guys dream of. Almost an idea of a man that is too
good to be true." He enters Act 1, however, in love not with Juliet but
with Rosaline, and to a greater extent in love with the idea of being in
love and with its language. He expresses himself in "ay me's" and
overblown oxymorons. Neither Mercutio nor Romeo has a very admirable
attitude toward love; one will die for an ideal of macho honor and the
other for a tragic-romantic ideal of love, both unnecessarily. These
immature and hormonal characters' words tell the story that Shakespeare
wrote.
Romeo and Juliet is not simply a condemnation of foolish boys, though.
As the sentimental Romeo's aesthetic redeemer, Juliet does deserve a
celebration of romantic love, but her constancy and good sense are
overtaken by the fathers' feud and the boys' street-fights, where women
have no place. Jean E. Howard and Phyllis Rackin observe that the
connections and contradictions between "aggressive masculinity, and
closeted womanhood . . . are present in Shakespeare's text, marking it
with a modernity that bears investigation" (10). This investigation is
one that the play's first, early modern, audience would have made
automatically in going to hear a new play. But it is a difficult
investigation for today's audience to make, not only because Romeo and
Juliet is culturally iconic but also because audiences today, unlike the
Elizabethans, go to see plays. We have become used to spectacle, through
lighting, special effects and the cinema. This dependence on our eyes
joins with Romeo and Juliet's cultural baggage to effectively deafen us
to the play's critical take on teenage love and eye-for-an-eye patriarchy.
-Laura Pyle
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Weiss <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 14:16:03 -0500
Subject: 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Comment: Re: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
I think this young lady has it spot on. Romeo and Juliet did not know
each other long enough to develop a profound romantic attachment. This
was a case of pubescent hormones run amok. In fact, I suspect that
Romeo did not really have "Th' exchange of thy love's faithful vow for
mine" in mind when he complained that Juliet was leaving him
"unsatisfied." It was his quick thinking in response to Juliet's
shocked "What satisfaction canst thou have tonight?" that led to the
ensuing complications.
[4]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: L. Swilley <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 15:00:40 -0500
Subject: 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Comment: Re: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Tanya Gough wrote,
>While poking around in the MySpace Shakespeare group
>(http://groups.myspace.com/shakespeare), I came across a
>posting from a 17 year old girl as follows:
>
>>Whilst reading Romeo & Juliet the other week I found that,
>>to me, the story was more about teenage stupidity than
>>epic romance.
>>
>>Did I just miss the point?
>
>This got me thinking. Obviously, the question contains an assumption
>that the play is either/or, and it's a remarkably over-simplified
question
>that begs any one of many complex answers. The general consensus
>on the MySpace list (mostly high school and college students, actors,
>the occasional teacher, and generalists), is that the girl is spot on.
[No, she's spot off. The play is principally Juliet's story; she is a
young woman who has deliberately entered the adult world (the marriage),
then doesn't accept the responsibility and attempts to hide it. ]
[5]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Richard Regan <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 20:44:24 -0400
Subject: 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Comment: Re: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Are they reacting to the Luhrmann film? My students seem to connect with
Danes and DiCaprio.
Richard Regan
Fairfield University
[6]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mari Bonomi <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Wednesday, 28 Mar 2007 00:38:32 -0400
Subject: 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Comment: RE: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Having spent 35 years intimately connected with the play and its impact
on 14-16 year olds, I frankly never thought it was "epic romance"!
Nor it is teenaged "stupidity."
First of all "Teenaged" is not a concept that I think Shakespeare had
much if any grasp on.
Secondly, to me the play has always been much about two things: the
subversion of the "star-crossed" statement and the demonstration that
old and young are equally guilty of impetuousness, action without
forethought, careless and incomplete creation and fulfillment of plans.
"Wisely and slow, they stumble that run fast" is repeatedly and
excessively disobeyed by all and sundry.
I could go on for pages but will stop there... (which is most definitely
not "stop[ping] in my tale against the hair" as Mercutio would have it).
Mari Bonomi
[7]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Colin Cox <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 27 Mar 2007 22:52:51 -0700
Subject: 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Comment: Re: SHK 18.0218 Romeo and Juliet
Having directed the play five times and having played every part from
Mercutio to the Nurse to the Prince, Paris and the good Lawrence, I
think the girl is spot on! Still love it though.
Colin Cox
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
