|
SHAKSPER Roundtable Postmortem |
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0323 Tuesday, 8 May 2007
From: Cary DiPietro <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 30 Apr 2007 11:19:56 -0400
Subject: SHAKSPER Roundtable Postmortem
In the final installment of the Presentism Roundtable, John Drakakis
opines:
>"I was a little disappointed in that the round-table never quite got down
>to dealing with the conceptual framework of 'Presentism'... Nobody so far
as
>I recall, raised the question of writing history, and of writing
different
>kinds of history, or of dealing with the business of historiography and
its
>protocols... I raise this, because unless and until we engage with this
>issue then 'Presentism' falls back into a domesticated version of the
>Derridean preoccupation with the future."
I'm not suggesting that I did a very good job there, but I did at least
raise the issue of history as a narrative structure in one of the first of
the Roundtable digests, precisely with a view to stimulating discussion
about conceptual frameworks for Presentism:
http://www.shaksper.net/archives/2007/0091.html
The post was unnecessarily long, or perhaps it was the spectre of Jameson
that scared him off. In any case, I would refer John to an article
recently published in the journal _Shakespeare_ (3:1, March 2007) that
offers a more cogent exploration of presentism and historical narrative
precisely in this vein:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=g776352430~db=all
Shameless self-promotion, I know, but topical nonetheless...
Cary DiPietro
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions
expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor
assumes no responsibility for them.
|