The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0588 Monday, 10 September 2007
Date: Friday, 07 Sep 2007 13:00:30 -0400
Subject: Authorial Intention
"The state of a man's mind is as much a fact as the state of his
digestion" (O.W. Holmes, Jr.)
When John Drakakis says that it is "futile" to attempt to discern what
an author intended by his writings, just exactly what is he telling us?
(If there is a conundrum buried in that question, so be it.) Is he
(1) All the author left us were words, words, words; meaningless place
holders that we need to fill with significance of our own devising;
(2) Texts are frequently ambiguous -- sometimes deliberately, sometimes
(3) The exact impact which the author expected the text to have on his
audience cannot be determined because of such factors as cultural
evolution, philological changes, etc.;
(4) A person's mental operations are inherently obscure and cannot be
confidently assigned even if he tells us what they are;
(5) All of the above:
(6) Some of the above;
(7) Something different?
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.