Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2009 :: April ::
Update on Patricia Parker's Dispute with Arden
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 20.0159  Monday, 6 April 2009

From:       John Drakakis <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:       Monday, 6 Apr 2009 16:40:04 +0100
Subject:    RE: Update on Patricia Parker's Dispute with Arden Shakespeare


I would be very grateful if you would publish a correction of a detail 
in your recent posting concerning the Patricia Parker MND affair. In 
your gloss on my letter that you kindly printed you mentioned the 
enlistment of Andrew Gurr as 'co-editor' for MND. The proposal, that I 
submitted to Arden/Cengage on 22 August 2008 made it clear that given 
the difficulties surrounding this edition Professor Gurr would be asked 
to take on the role of general editor for this volume. Professor Gurr in 
a public statement made it clear that this proposal was never  put to 
him, but that if it were, he would accept.

Readers of this list may see the full text of the original proposal on 
the website hosted by Professor Richard Halpern <reinstatepatparker.com>.

With very many thanks,
John Drakakis


[Editor's Note: My apologies. Below is a corrected version of the Update 
I sent originally on Wednesday, March 25, 2009, in SHAKSPER digest SHK 
20.0136 <http://www.shaksper.net/archives/2009/0134.html>. Finally, to 
clear up any misunderstanding, after the corrected version of the post, 
I have reproduced John Drakakis' posting to the Reinstate Pat Parker 
petition website <http://arden.petitionhost.com/msg_1221514631>.  At the 
website, the posting is followed by the supporting comments and 
responses from the Shakespeareans I mention below. --Hardy M. Cook, 
Editor of SHAKSPER]


********************
Update on Patricia Parker's Dispute with Arden Shakespeare (Corrected 
Version)

In January, Cengage Learning quietly sold The Arden Shakespeare to the 
Methuen Drama division of Bloomsbury Publishing. I and others had hoped 
that this sale might be an opportunity for Methuen to reinstate Patricia 
Parker under the proposal John Drakakis made in August 2008 and that was 
discussed on the Richard Halpern site, beginning in September.

After several months of silence, I received a note from a SHAKSPER 
subscriber and decided to see what I could find out about the situation. 
  Anyone who wrote to Methuen about the matter received a form letter 
from Margaret Bartley, who for many years has overseen the Arden series 
as publisher, first at Thomson Learning, then the Cengage, and now at A 
& C Black. In this form letter, she writes, "We [Methuen Drama] have 
been made aware of the dispute between Patricia Parker on the one side 
and Cengage Learning and the Arden General Editors on the other. . . . 
At this early stage in our [presumably Methuen Drama's] acquisition of 
this list, it is nevertheless clear to Methuen Drama that the publishing 
relationship between Patricia Parker and her previous publisher and the 
General Editors of Arden had irretrievably broken down."

Yesterday, I wrote to John Drakakis who had made the proposal that Prof. 
Andrew Gurr be appointed as co-editor to see the substantially completed 
edition through to its conclusion.

<Quotation>
I recently received an email from a SHAKSPER subscriber concerning 
Cengage Learning's sale of the Arden Shakespeare to Methuen Drama, an 
imprint of A&C Black Publishers, Ltd., which is a subsidiary of 
Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; the email inquired if Methuen might now be 
willing to reinstate Patricia Parker as editor of A Midsummer Night's 
Dream: "I wondered if they [Methuen] might be more willing to reinstate 
Patricia Parker as the editor of A Midsummer Night's Dream, about which 
there has been so much concern. Maybe it would be helpful if some of us 
asked them?"

Before I posted this query, I wanted to find out additional information.

The announcement 
<http://www.ardenshakespeare.com/methuen_drama.aspx>directs queries to 
Suzi Williamson, but anyone who writes asking about Pat Parker's 
possible reinstatement receives a form letter from Margaret Bartley, the 
Arden Publisher:

  >My colleague Suzi Williamson has passed your
  >email on to me as the Publisher for the Arden
  >Shakespeare. Perhaps I may simply include below
  >the letter we have sent to anyone contacting A&C
  >Black with regard to Professor Parker's edition:
  >
  >Methuen Drama, an imprint of A&C Black Publishers Ltd,
  >purchased the Arden Shakespeare list from
  >
  >Methuen Drama is one of Europe's largest performing arts
  >publishers, with a long-term commitment to
  >the publication of contemporary plays as well as student
  >and scholarly editions, both under its own
  >imprint, and under the name of New Mermaids.

  >We have been made aware of the dispute between
  >Patricia Parker on the one side and Cengage Learning
  >and the Arden General Editors on the other.
  >
  >We are not in a position to comment further at present
  >on the rights and wrongs of the case nor, given that
  >this is a long-standing contractual dispute concerning
  >an author with a previous publisher, is it appropriate.
  >
  >At this early stage in our acquisition of this list, it is
  >nevertheless clear to Methuen Drama that the publishing
  >relationship between Patricia Parker and her previous
  >publisher and the General Editors of Arden had irretrievably
  >broken down. We think that it is in neither the interests of
  >the Arden Shakespeare list, nor of Professor Parker, to
  >continue this discussion further.

At the website set up by Richard Halpern to solicit signatures on a 
petition to reinstate Pat Parker, a discussion took place in the Discuss 
the Petition section regarding your suggestion that Prof. Andrew Gurr be 
brought in as a co-editor to oversee the edition. This discussion began 
on September 15, 2008, when you wrote, "I copy below the relevant 
section of the letter that I sent to Cengage on 22 August":

  >Certainly there is now sufficient uncontested information
  >in the public domain to warrant the immediate and
  >unconditional reinstatement of Professor Parker.
  >
  >I think that in the interests of the reputation of Arden,
  >there is no alternative to this course of action. I would
  >very strongly advise against the appointment of a co-editor
  >at this late stage, since this would simply impede the process
  >of completion, and would raise further (dare I say sinister)
  >questions about Arden's general editorial procedures. The
  >best way forward for all concerned, I suggest, would be
  >to bring in an independent, experienced, internationally
  >recognised Shakespearean textual and theatrical scholar
  >such as Professor Andrew Gurr, to oversee this edition. I
  >understand that Professor Gurr has seen substantial amounts
  >of Professor Parker's ongoing work on this edition over the
  >last few years, which is, I imagine, the reason why she
  >has been invited to deliver a keynote lecture at a
  >forthcoming Globe conference to be held in his honour.
  >This course of action would, I believe, be welcomed
  >by the scholarly community generally, and would also
  >have the effect of restoring confidence in the Arden
  >project that has been seriously damaged by this whole affair.
  >
  >I trust that you will regard my concern in this matter as
  >being in the best interests of the Arden 3 Series. It is of
  >vital importance that proper collegial relations be
  >re-established as a matter of urgency, since if the
  >situation is allowed to continue unchecked, then the
  >opportunity to redeem what has quickly become a very
  >critical situation will have been lost. I am circulating
  >this letter to all those directly involved in Arden,
  >since I understand that this particular case has
  >generated very considerable anxiety amongst
  >scholars actively involving in completing Arden projects.

You concluded, "I reprint this extract here in the fervent hope that it 
will help to bring to a speedy conclusion a matter that many of us 
regard as being very serious indeed."

Many eminent Shakespearean scholars and textual editors expressed 
support of your proposal:  Paul Yachnin, Michael Neill,  John Cox, 
Juliet Dusinberre, Leah S. Marcus, David Bevington, Peter Holland, 
Charles Edelman, Robert S. Miola, Michael Warren, Andrew Murphy, Harry 
Berger, Jr., Margreta de Grazia, Helen Ostovich, Terence Hawkes, Steven 
Mullaney, Martin Orkin, John Joughin, Dennis Kennedy, and Peter Hulme.

Since you are an Arden editor yourself and the proposer of the 
suggestion that Andrew Gurr be appointed as general editor to oversee 
the Parker edition of _A Midsummer Night's Dream_, I am writing to ask 
you if you can share with me (or with the SHAKSPER subscribers) the 
current state of your suggestion?
</Quotation>


Today, I received a reply from John Drakakis. He begins by informing me 
that he had "just returned from Europe, where the Patricia Parker issue 
is still very much alive, and is causing considerable concern among 
scholars." He then goes on to say the following,


<Quotation>
Indeed, I have received an email from an eminent Renaissance scholar 
recently expressing outrage at the decision to terminate Professor 
Parker's contract. The proposal that I made in a letter of 22 August, 
2008 has never been formally put to Professor Gurr, and he has said in 
writing that were it to be put to him then he would be willing to act in 
the capacity I outlined. I firmly believe that this is the only way 
forward if the Arden general editors wish to remove the taint from their 
collective reputation.

Professor Parker's edition is the most eagerly awaited of all Arden 
editions, and I am very disappointed that Methuen have not taken the 
opportunity on acquiring the Arden Series to cat in the proper manner.
</Quotation>


Prof. Drakakis also included a copy of an email he sent to Margaret 
Bartley on January 13, 2009:


<Quotation>
I still have one nagging concern, which is that the Patricia Parker 
Midsummer Night's Dream issue has not, and will not, go away until a 
proper solution is found. In the light of your recent announcement I can 
now see why Cengage were eager to give the impression that the issue was 
closed, and I can see that you had no alternative but to comply. But at 
present there is still in existence a website that contains a very large 
number of influential signatories whose opinions you should take 
seriously in the new atmosphere that this sale has created. I am sure 
that I am not alone in continuing to be concerned that the threat of a 
world-wide boycott of Arden Shakespeare volumes still hangs over us. You 
and I both know that that threat is real, and that it will jeopardise 
our collective scholarly work as well as the future of Arden.

The Halpern website is a more than ample testimony to the strength of 
feeling that this issue has created, and in my view there are two things 
that will result in its being removed. At the end of last year, both you 
and Cengage (and in the light of various documents that I have seen, I 
am still very reluctant to believe that you and they are the same) 
indicated that there were no plans to re-assign A Midsummer Night's 
Dream. Whatever the motive for that strategy, it was the right move, and 
this seems an appropriate moment to reflect on the acknowledged 
10-years' work that Professor Parker has already undertaken, and to 
think about re-instatement. If, as you say, the series is nearing 
completion, then the guarantee that the series will be completed in a 
timely fashion would surely be to reinstate Professor Parker in the full 
knowledge that an edition of A Midsummer Night's Dream will be 
forthcoming within the current schedule. A particular proposal has been 
on the table since August 22 that has attracted widespread support, and 
may yet, in the light of Professor Gurr's own response to a letter from 
Jill Jones of Cengage at the end of last year, provide the basis for 
further discussion.

The sale to Bloomsbury provides a unique opportunity to initiate a break 
with the events of the last 6 months in relation to A Midsummer Night's 
Dream and it is one that should not, in my view, be allowed to pass by. 
  I would be very unhappy- and again, I don't think that I am alone in 
this- if a situation that can now be resolved amicably in a very 
positive atmosphere should be allowed to deteriorate into recrimination, 
and claim and counter-claim, all conducted in a far more public forum 
than has been the case so far.

This is a moment to reflect on the events of the last 6 months, and to 
do whatever is necessary to lift the threat of serious damage that still 
hangs over the Arden Shakespeare project. I would urge you to think 
carefully and to resist any temptation to sustain the damaging 
managerialist ethos so characteristic of Cengage. In doing so I have no 
doubt that you would receive the overwhelming support of the Shakespeare 
community, and I feel certain that many of the threats of boycott of the 
Arden Shakespeare would disappear overnight. The alternative is too 
horrific to contemplate at any time, but especially at the beginning of 
a new year.
</Quotation>

I too hope that Prof. Parker is reinstated to the Arden Shakespeare 
project, so its good name can be returned, bruised but not broken.

Hardy M. Cook
Editor of SHAKSPER
*******************


<B>August 22 proposal regarding Andrew Gurr</B>

The following is an extract from my letter to Cengage of 22 August 2008 
in which I proposed a solution to the present situation with regard to 
Professor Parker's termination as the editor of the Arden 3 Midsummer 
Night's Dream. The letter was circulated to all those involved in Arden 
projects, and since then a number of fellow scholars have either written 
to me privately to say that they support this solution, and/or have said 
so publicly. In the interests of clarity, and in response to those to 
whom the full text of the letter was not circulated, and who have asked 
for the details, I copy below the relevant section of the letter that I 
sent to Cengage on 22 August:

"Certainly there is now sufficient uncontested information in the public 
domain to warrant the immediate and unconditional reinstatement of 
Professor Parker.

I think that in the interests of the reputation of Arden, there is no 
alternative to this course of action. I would very strongly advise 
against the appointment of a co-editor at this late stage, since this 
would simply impede the process of completion, and would raise further 
(dare I say sinister) questions about Arden's general editorial 
procedures. The best way forward for all concerned, I suggest, would be 
to bring in an independent, experienced, internationally recognised 
Shakespearean textual and theatrical scholar such as Professor Andrew 
Gurr, to oversee this edition. I understand that Professor Gurr has seen 
substantial amounts of Professor Parker's ongoing work on this edition 
over the last few years, which is, I imagine, the reason why she has 
been invited to deliver a keynote lecture at a forthcoming Globe 
conference to be held in his honour. This course of action would, I 
believe, be welcomed by the scholarly community generally, and would 
also have the effect of restoring confidence in the Arden project that 
has been seriously damaged by this whole affair.

I trust that you will regard my concern in this matter as being in the 
best interests of the Arden 3 Series. It is of vital importance that 
proper collegial relations be re-established as a matter of urgency, 
since if the situation is allowed to continue unchecked, then the 
opportunity to redeem what has quickly become a very critical situation 
will have been lost. I am circulating this letter to all those directly 
involved in Arden, since I understand that this particular case has 
generated very considerable anxiety amongst scholars actively involving 
in completing Arden projects."

I reprint this extract here in the fervent hope that it will help to 
bring to a speedy conclusion a matter that many of us regard as being 
very serious indeed.

John Drakakis
<http://arden.petitionhost.com/msg_1221514631>


_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the 
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the 
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.