The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 20.0577 Wednesday, 18 November 2009
[1] From: Chris Jacobs <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 12 Nov 2009 08:31:22 +0800
Subj: Re: SHK 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
[2] From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 11 Nov 2009 20:17:42 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
[3] From: David J. Wardell <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 12 Nov 2009 09:35:41 -0500
Subj: RE: SHK 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
[4] From: Justin Alexander <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 12 Nov 2009 12:20:50 -0600
Subj: Re: SHK 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Chris Jacobs <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 12 Nov 2009 08:31:22 +0800
Subject: 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
Comment: Re: SHK 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
>Even more attentive reader may have noted that this is not the first
>time that Terence Hawkes has posed his "Why on earth" or variations
>thereof question.
Mr Hawkes does seem to have a propensity of playing devil's advocate by
posting such emotive statements. I enjoy the inevitable responses that
they evoke. Long may they continue.
Apropos 'Shakespeare for Children'; I have just completed conducting an
enrichment programme for young teenagers at a school in SE Asia entitled
"Shakespeare ala Manga", which sought to introduce the Bard's life and
works in a manner immediately accessible to children of non-English
speaking cultures. Whilst the attrition rate of participating children
approached 50%, the remaining group, of 32, emerged with a new found
excitement, not just in the discovery of the wonders and relevance of
Shakespeare's language, but also in the joy of creating theatre for
themselves, and bringing those immortal words to life.
These Children are already talking about next year's programme.
Kindly
Chris Jacobs
[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 11 Nov 2009 20:17:42 -0500
Subject: 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
Comment: Re: SHK 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
Because otherwise they will have to pick it up in the street.
[3]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: David J. Wardell <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 12 Nov 2009 09:35:41 -0500
Subject: 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
Comment: RE: SHK 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
My children went with me to countless performances in Ashland, Oregon,
and also London. The secret for me was getting seats on or near the
front row -- so seeing and hearing wasn't an issue. Their questions and
comments were more insightful than many adults.
Children's versions weren't necessary -- just good seats.
Come to think of it, my first copy of Shakespeare's works (bought with
my own money, and which I still have) was probably acquired around age 8-10.
Best regards,
David Wardell
[4]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Justin Alexander <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 12 Nov 2009 12:20:50 -0600
Subject: 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
Comment: Re: SHK 20.0566 Shakespeare for children?
Terence Hawkes <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
>Why on earth would anyone want to expose eight-year-old children to
Shakespeare?
When I was a wee lad, my mother used to wander around the house quoting
Shakespeare while doing the chores. Around the time that I was 8 (in the
2nd grade), I pulled the Folger edition of Henry IV Part 1 off the shelf
and muscled my way through it. The facing-page notes of the Folger
edition were quite helpful, but did I fully understand it? Of course not.
(On the other hand, does anyone ever FULLY understand Shakespeare's
work? Isn't part of the joy of the Bard the fact that we never seem to
stop finding new layers to peel off the fruit of his mind?)
But was I able to get some pleasure out of it? Yes. And even more
pleasure out of Branagh's Henry V (which I saw when I was 10)? Yes. And
even more out of the Guthrie Theater productions of Richard II and Henry
V (which I saw when I was 12)? Yes.
I think it literally impossible to give a child something which is too
intellectually challenging to them. Are there challenges which they may
fail at? Or fail in part? Yes. But such failures are the stuff of
learning. Such failures are the hurdles which we grow and rise to meet.
Those who treat children as if they were dullards are, in my experience,
responsible for rearing those who will be dullards as adults.
Justin Alexander
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook,
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|